Creating a biodiversity science community: Experiences from a European Network of Knowledge

被引:28
作者
Carmen, Esther [1 ]
Nesshoever, Carsten [2 ]
Saarikoski, Heli [3 ]
Vandewalle, Marie [2 ]
Watt, Allan [1 ]
Wittmer, Heidi [4 ]
Young, Juliette [1 ]
机构
[1] NERC Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Edinburgh EH26 0QB, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Conservat Biol, Leipzig, Germany
[3] SYKE, Helsinki, Finland
[4] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Environm Polit, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Science-policy interfaces; European research; Biodiversity; IPBES; Network of Knowledge; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As biodiversity continues to decline despite our increased knowledge of the drivers and consequences of biodiversity loss, much of the current focus is on strengthening interfaces between biodiversity knowledge and policy-making. While many of the challenges associated with science-policy interfaces are well known, what is less well studied is the more specific issue of how to integrate the broad range of knowledge relating to complex issues such as biodiversity and ecosystem services, to inform decision-making at regional and global scales. Based on a formative evaluation of the development of a European Network of Knowledge on biodiversity and ecosystem services, we identify key themes to build a broad biodiversity science community capable of developing integrated knowledge to inform decision-making. Based on these findings we outline future steps for the successful integration of knowledge in decision-making at the European, and also the global scale, in particular the Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Crown Copyright (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:497 / 504
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Conservation, evidence and policy [J].
Adams, William M. ;
Sandbrook, Chris .
ORYX, 2013, 47 (03) :329-335
[2]  
[Anonymous], WHY INTERVIEW INTERV
[3]  
[Anonymous], CONC NOT NETW KNOWL
[4]  
[Anonymous], QUALITATIVE RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 3 AD HOC INT MULT M
[6]  
[Anonymous], GLOB BIOD OUTL
[7]  
[Anonymous], REC DES BIODIVERSITY
[8]   What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes [J].
Beierle, TC ;
Konisky, DM .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2001, 19 (04) :515-527
[9]  
Bryman A., 2004, SOCIAL RES METHODS
[10]  
Burnham Peter., 2004, RES METHODS POLITICS