New Integrated Quality Function Deployment Approach Based on Interval Neutrosophic Set for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection

被引:39
作者
Luu Huu Van [1 ]
Yu, Vincent F. [1 ]
Luu Quoc Dat [2 ]
Canh Chi Dung [3 ]
Shuo-Yan Chou [1 ]
Nguyen Viet Loc [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Management, 43,Sect 4,Keelung Rd, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
[2] Vietnam Natl Univ, Univ Econ & Business, 144 Xuan Thuy Rd, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[3] Minist Educ & Training, 35 Dai Co Viet Rd, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
关键词
quality function deployment; TOPSIS; interval neutrosophic; green supplier selection; MULTI CRITERIA APPROACH; FUZZY MCDM APPROACH; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; DECISION-MAKING; QFD; CHAIN; MANAGEMENT; NETWORK; AHP; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.3390/su10030838
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green supplier evaluation and selection plays a crucial role in the green supply chain management of any organization to reduce the purchasing cost of materials and increase the flexibility and quality of products. An interval neutrosophic set (INS)-which is a generalization of fuzzy sets, intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFS) and neutrosophic sets (NS)-can better handle the incomplete, indeterminate and inconsistent information than the other sets. This paper proposes a new integrated Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in support of the green supplier evaluation and selection process. In the proposed approach, INS is used to assess the relative importance of the characteristics that the purchased product should have (internal variables "WHATs") in order to satisfy the company's needs, the relevant supplier assessment criteria (external variables "HOWs"), the "HOWs"-"WHATs" correlation scores, the resulting weights of the "HOWs" and the impact of each potential supplier. The normalized weighted rating is then defined and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is developed to obtain a final ranking of green suppliers. A case study is applied to demonstrate the efficiency and computational procedure of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: Lean or agile? [J].
Abdollahi, Mohammad ;
Arvan, Meysam ;
Razmi, Jafar .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (01) :679-690
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, NEURAL COMPUT APPL
[3]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[4]   MORE ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 33 (01) :37-45
[5]   A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;
Goyal, S. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 126 (02) :370-378
[6]  
Azadnia Amir Hossein, 2013, Applied Mechanics and Materials, V315, P206, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.315.206
[7]   Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (12) :1200-1210
[8]   The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods [J].
Beikkhakhian, Yokabed ;
Javanmardi, Mohammad ;
Karbasian, Mahdi ;
Khayambashi, Bijan .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (15-16) :6224-6236
[9]  
Bevilacqua M., 2006, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V12, P14, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2006.02.001
[10]   Supplier selection paradigm: An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple-criteria environment [J].
Bhattacharya, Arijit ;
Geraghty, John ;
Young, Paul .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2010, 10 (04) :1013-1027