The research space: using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals, institutions, and nations

被引:76
作者
Guevara, Miguel R. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Hartmann, Dominik [1 ,3 ]
Aristaran, Manuel [1 ]
Mendoza, Marcelo [4 ]
Hidalgo, Cesar A. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Media Lab, Macro Connect, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Univ Playa Ancha, Dept Comp Sci, Valparaiso, Chile
[3] Univ Hohenheim, Chair Econ Innovat, Stuttgart, Germany
[4] Univ Tecn Federico Santa Maria, Dept Informat, Santiago, Chile
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
Maps of science; Research policy; Innovation policy; Career paths; Scientograms; RCA; SCIENCE; MAPS; COCITATION; CATEGORIES;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-016-2125-9
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
In recent years scholars have built maps of science by connecting the academic fields that cite each other, are cited together, or that cite a similar literature. But since scholars cannot always publish in the fields they cite, or that cite them, these science maps are only rough proxies for the potential of a scholar, organization, or country, to enter a new academic field. Here we use a large dataset of scholarly publications disambiguated at the individual level to create a map of science-or research space-where links connect pairs of fields based on the probability that an individual has published in both of them. We find that the research space is a significantly more accurate predictor of the fields that individuals and organizations will enter in the future than citation based science maps. At the country level, however, the research space and citations based science maps are equally accurate. These findings show that data on career trajectories-the set of fields that individuals have previously published in-provide more accurate predictors of future research output for more focalized units-such as individuals or organizations-than citation based science maps.
引用
收藏
页码:1695 / 1709
页数:15
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   How do you define and measure research productivity? [J].
Abramo, Giovanni ;
D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 101 (02) :1129-1144
[2]   TRADE LIBERALISATION AND REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BALASSA, B .
MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 1965, 33 (02) :99-123
[3]   Design and Update of a Classification System: The UCSD Map of Science [J].
Boerner, Katy ;
Klavans, Richard ;
Patek, Michael ;
Zoss, Angela M. ;
Biberstine, Joseph R. ;
Light, Robert P. ;
Lariviere, Vincent ;
Boyack, Kevin W. .
PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07)
[4]  
Bollen J, 2009, PLOS ONE, V4, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0004803, 10.1371/journal.pone.0006022]
[5]   Mapping the backbone of science [J].
Boyack, KW ;
Klavans, R ;
Börner, K .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2005, 64 (03) :351-374
[6]   The Scientific Competitiveness of Nations [J].
Cimini, Giulio ;
Gabrielli, Andrea ;
Labini, Francesco Sylos .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12)
[7]  
Collins Harry, 2012, M. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge
[8]  
Cybermetrics Lab, 2015, US RANK WEB U
[9]   Competition in Research Activity among Economic Departments: Evidence by Negative Spatial Autocorrelation [J].
Elhorst, J. Paul ;
Zigova, Katarina .
GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 46 (02) :104-125
[10]   Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists [J].
Fox, MF .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2005, 35 (01) :131-150