Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications for sustainability issues

被引:206
作者
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras [1 ]
Govindan, Kannan [2 ]
Antucheviciene, Jurgita [1 ]
Turskis, Zenonas [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Construct Technol & Management, Vilnius, Lithuania
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Ctr Sustainable Engn Operat Management, Dept Technol & Innovat, Odense, Denmark
来源
ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA | 2016年 / 29卷 / 01期
关键词
Decision-making; sustainability; multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM); hybrid MCDM (HMCDM; COPRAS-G METHODS; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; MODEL COMBINING DEMATEL; FUZZY MCDM APPROACH; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; SUPPLIER SELECTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; GREEN SUPPLIER; 50TH ANNIVERSARY; VENDOR SELECTION;
D O I
10.1080/1331677X.2016.1237302
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Formal decision-making methods can be used to help improve the overall sustainability of industries and organisations. Recently, there has been a great proliferation of works aggregating sustainability criteria by using diverse multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques. A number of review papers summarising these techniques have been published. During the past few years, new approaches for hybrid MCDM (HMCDM) methods have been developed, but they have not yet been completely reviewed. This article aims to fill this gap and to summarise publications related to the application of HMCDM. The current study is limited solely to papers available in the Thomson Reuters Web of Science Core Collection database. The main findings report that HMCDM methods have been increasingly applied for supporting decisions in different domains of sustainability. The most frequently used methods emphasise the advantages of hybrid approaches over individual methods, and we conclude that they can assist decision-makers in handling information such as stakeholders' preferences, interconnected or contradictory criteria, and uncertain environments. The main contribution of this work is identifying hybrid approaches as improvements for decision-making related to sustainability issues, while also promoting future application of the approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 887
页数:31
相关论文
共 219 条
[1]  
Aghdaie MH, 2013, TRANSFORM BUS ECON, V12, P431
[2]   Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods [J].
Aguezzoul, Aicha .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2014, 49 :69-78
[3]   A hybrid approach based on locally linear neuro-fuzzy modeling and TOPSIS to determine the quality grade of gas well-drilling projects [J].
Ahari, Roya M. ;
Niaki, S. T. A. .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 114 :99-106
[4]   Organizational decision to adopt hospital information system: An empirical investigation in the case of Malaysian public hospitals [J].
Ahmadi, Hossein ;
Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh ;
IbrahimFaculty, Othman .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2015, 84 (03) :166-188
[5]   A NOVEL HYBRID SWARA AND VIKOR METHODOLOGY FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION IN AN AGILE ENVIRONMENT [J].
Alimardani, Maryam ;
Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz ;
Aghdaie, Mohammad Hasan ;
Tamosaitiene, Jolanta .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2013, 19 (03) :533-548
[6]   A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation [J].
Amiri, M. ;
Zandieh, M. ;
Soltani, R. ;
Vahdani, B. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (10) :12314-12322
[7]  
[Anonymous], ACTIVITY ANAL PRODUC
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1970, Utility Theory for Decision Making
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis : State of the art Surveys, DOI DOI 10.1007/b100605