The Influence of the Dilution Rate on the Aggressiveness of Inocula and the Expression of Resistance against Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat

被引:7
作者
Toth, Beata [1 ,2 ]
Gyorgy, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Varga, Monika [1 ,3 ]
Mesterhazy, Akos [2 ]
机构
[1] NAIK Dept Field Crops Res, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary
[2] Cereal Res Nonprofit Ltd, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary
[3] Univ Szeged, Dept Microbiol, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2020年 / 9卷 / 08期
关键词
Fusarium head blight; resistance; artificial inoculation; deoxynivalenol (DON); Fusarium damaged kernels (FDK); disease index (DI); WINTER-WHEAT; SPRING WHEAT; COMMON RESISTANCE; GENETIC-ANALYSIS; GRAMINEARUM; DEOXYNIVALENOL; CULMORUM; FIELD; PATHOGENICITY; BIOSYNTHESIS;
D O I
10.3390/plants9080943
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In previous research, conidium concentrations varying between 10,000 and 1,000,000/mL have not been related to any aggressiveness test. Therefore, two Fusarium graminearum and two Fusarium culmorum isolates were tested in the field on seven genotypes highly differing in resistance at no dilution, and 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16 dilutions in two years (2013 and 2014). The isolates showed different aggressiveness, which changed significantly at different dilution rates for disease index (DI), Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK), and deoxynivalenol (DON). The traits also had diverging responses to the infection. The effect of the dilution could not be forecasted. The genotype ranks also varied. Dilution seldomly increased aggressiveness, but often lower aggressiveness occurred at high variation. The maximum and minimum values varied between 15% and 40% for traits and dilutions. The reductions between the non-diluted and diluted values (total means) for DI ranged from 6% and 33%, for FDK 8.3-37.7%, and for DON 5.8-44.8%. The most sensitive and most important trait was DON. The introduction of the aggressiveness test provides improved regulation compared to the uncontrolled manipulation of the conidium concentration. The use of more isolates significantly increases the credibility of phenotyping in genetic and cultivar registration studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 30
页数:26
相关论文
共 76 条
[51]   Role of Fungicides, Application of Nozzle Types, and the Resistance Level of Wheat Varieties in the Control of Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol [J].
Mesterhazy, Akos ;
Toth, Beata ;
Varga, Monika ;
Bartok, Tibor ;
Szabo-Hever, Agnes ;
Farady, Laszlo ;
Lehoczki-Krsjak, Szabolcs .
TOXINS, 2011, 3 (11) :1453-1483
[52]   Genetic variation of aggressiveness in individual field populations of Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum tested on young plants of winter rye [J].
Miedaner, T ;
Schilling, AG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1996, 102 (09) :823-830
[53]  
Nopsa J.F.H, 2010, THESIS
[54]   Effects of introgression of two QTL for fusarium head blight resistance from Asian spring wheat by marker-assisted backcrossing into European winter wheat on fusarium head blight resistance, yield and quality traits [J].
Salameh, A. ;
Buerstmayr, M. ;
Steiner, B. ;
Neumayer, A. ;
Lemmens, M. ;
Buerstmayr, H. .
MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2011, 28 (04) :485-494
[55]  
Scholz U., 2001, Proceedings of 2001 National Fusarium Head Blight Forum, P147
[56]   DIALLEL ANALYSIS OF RESISTANCE TO HEAD BLIGHT CAUSED BY FUSARIUM-CULMORUM IN WINTER-WHEAT [J].
SNIJDERS, CHA .
EUPHYTICA, 1990, 50 (01) :1-9
[57]  
SNIJDERS CHA, 1990, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V80, P566, DOI 10.1094/Phyto-80-566
[58]   Genetic analysis of Fusarium head blight resistance in bread wheat [J].
Soltanloo, Hassan ;
Khorzoghi, Effat Ghadirzade ;
Ramezanpour, S. Sanaz ;
Arabi, Mehdi Kalateh .
AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2011, 40 (05) :453-460
[59]   Semi-dwarfing Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 loci of wheat differ significantly in their influence on resistance to Fusarium head blight [J].
Srinivasachary ;
Gosman, N. ;
Steed, A. ;
Hollins, T. W. ;
Bayles, R. ;
Jennings, P. ;
Nicholson, P. .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2009, 118 (04) :695-702
[60]   A COMPARISON OF THE INOCULUM POTENTIAL OF ASCOSPORES AND CONIDIA OF GIBBERELLA-ZEAE [J].
STACK, RW .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYTOPATHOLOGIE, 1989, 11 (02) :137-142