The Influence of the Dilution Rate on the Aggressiveness of Inocula and the Expression of Resistance against Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat

被引:7
作者
Toth, Beata [1 ,2 ]
Gyorgy, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Varga, Monika [1 ,3 ]
Mesterhazy, Akos [2 ]
机构
[1] NAIK Dept Field Crops Res, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary
[2] Cereal Res Nonprofit Ltd, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary
[3] Univ Szeged, Dept Microbiol, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary
来源
PLANTS-BASEL | 2020年 / 9卷 / 08期
关键词
Fusarium head blight; resistance; artificial inoculation; deoxynivalenol (DON); Fusarium damaged kernels (FDK); disease index (DI); WINTER-WHEAT; SPRING WHEAT; COMMON RESISTANCE; GENETIC-ANALYSIS; GRAMINEARUM; DEOXYNIVALENOL; CULMORUM; FIELD; PATHOGENICITY; BIOSYNTHESIS;
D O I
10.3390/plants9080943
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In previous research, conidium concentrations varying between 10,000 and 1,000,000/mL have not been related to any aggressiveness test. Therefore, two Fusarium graminearum and two Fusarium culmorum isolates were tested in the field on seven genotypes highly differing in resistance at no dilution, and 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16 dilutions in two years (2013 and 2014). The isolates showed different aggressiveness, which changed significantly at different dilution rates for disease index (DI), Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK), and deoxynivalenol (DON). The traits also had diverging responses to the infection. The effect of the dilution could not be forecasted. The genotype ranks also varied. Dilution seldomly increased aggressiveness, but often lower aggressiveness occurred at high variation. The maximum and minimum values varied between 15% and 40% for traits and dilutions. The reductions between the non-diluted and diluted values (total means) for DI ranged from 6% and 33%, for FDK 8.3-37.7%, and for DON 5.8-44.8%. The most sensitive and most important trait was DON. The introduction of the aggressiveness test provides improved regulation compared to the uncontrolled manipulation of the conidium concentration. The use of more isolates significantly increases the credibility of phenotyping in genetic and cultivar registration studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 30
页数:26
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
ARMSTRONG GM, 1948, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V38, P808
[2]   Mycotoxin glucosylation in commercial wheat varieties: Impact on resistance to Fusarium graminearum under laboratory and field conditions [J].
Audenaert, Kris ;
De Boevre, Marthe ;
Vanheule, Adriaan ;
Callewaert, Jolien ;
Bekaert, Boris ;
Hofte, Monica ;
De Saeger, Sarah ;
Haesaert, Geert .
FOOD CONTROL, 2013, 34 (02) :756-762
[3]   Variation in Fusarium graminearum and cultivar resistance to wheat scab [J].
Bai, GH ;
Shaner, G .
PLANT DISEASE, 1996, 80 (09) :975-979
[4]   Resistance to Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol accumulation in wheat [J].
Bai, GH ;
Plattner, R ;
Desjardins, A ;
Kolb, F .
PLANT BREEDING, 2001, 120 (01) :1-6
[5]   Genetic analysis of resistance to Fusarium head blight caused by Fusarium graminearum in Chinese wheat cultivar Sumai 3 and the Japanese cultivar Saikai 165 [J].
Ban, T ;
Suenaga, K .
EUPHYTICA, 2000, 113 (02) :87-99
[6]   Development of a novel multiplex DNA microarray for Fusarium graminearum and analysis of azole fungicide responses [J].
Becher, Rayko ;
Weihmann, Fabian ;
Deising, Holger B. ;
Wirsel, Stefan G. R. .
BMC GENOMICS, 2011, 12
[7]   Prediction of hybrid performance for Fusarium head blight resistance in triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack) [J].
Boeven, Philipp H. G. ;
Wuerschum, Tobias ;
Weissmann, Sigrid ;
Miedaner, Thomas ;
Maurer, Hans Peter .
EUPHYTICA, 2016, 207 (03) :475-490
[8]  
Booth C, 1971, GENUS FUSARIUM, P271
[9]   Sexual recombination in Gibberella zeae [J].
Bowden, RL ;
Leslie, JF .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 89 (02) :182-188
[10]   Molecular mapping of QTLs for Fusarium head blight resistance in spring wheat. I. Resistance to fungal spread (type II resistance) [J].
Buerstmayr, H ;
Lemmens, M ;
Hartl, L ;
Doldi, L ;
Steiner, B ;
Stierschneider, M ;
Ruckenbauer, P .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2002, 104 (01) :84-91