Stakeholders' Influence and Contribution to Social Standards Development: The Case of Multiple Stakeholder Approach to ISO 26000 Development

被引:78
作者
Balzarova, Michaela A. [2 ]
Castka, Pavel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Management, Christchurch 1, New Zealand
[2] Lincoln Univ, Canterbury 7647, New Zealand
关键词
Production and evolution of standards; Social responsibility; Environmental responsibility; ISO; 26000; Stakeholders; UNITED-STATES; DIFFUSION; RESPONSIBILITY; ISO-9000; MEDIA; CERTIFICATION; LEADERSHIP; LEGITIMACY; MARKETS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-012-1206-9
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We present an empirical investigation on how multiple stakeholders can influence and contribute to a standard development process. Based on the analysis of comments submitted by stakeholders developing ISO 26000 standard for social responsibility, we found no significant differences between the ratio of accepted and non-accepted comments among various stakeholder groups; however, we conclude that industry is the most influential stakeholder due to the volume of the comments. We also present a set of processes that stakeholders follow to influence and contribute to standards development, namely to (1) eliminate issues that are controversial and undesirable; (2) link and integrate the standard into a network of other documents and ISO standards; (3) seek consensus by highlighting areas for further dialogue or by addressing their exclusion from the standards development, (4) reinforce issues that are important; and (5) improve the content of the new standard. In conclusion, we provide a set of propositions about multi-stakeholder standards development and compare multi-stakeholder involvement in standards developed through a new committee established in existing standards setting organization [i.e., Committees within the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)] and through new standards setting organizations established for one specific task (i.e., Forest Stewardship Council). We envisage that our study will be a useful platform to monitor and evaluate future developments of ISO 26000 and other multi-stakeholder standards.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 279
页数:15
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PART FUT INT STAND I
[2]   Underlying mechanisms in the maintenance of ISO 14001 environmental management system [J].
Balzarova, Michaela A. ;
Castka, Pavel .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (18) :1949-1957
[3]   Technical efficiency or adaptation to institutionalized expectations? The adoption of ISO 9000 standards in the German mechanical engineering industry [J].
Beck, N ;
Walgenbach, P .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2005, 26 (06) :841-866
[4]   Regulatory credibility and authority through inclusiveness:: Standardization organizations in cases of eco-labelling [J].
Bostrom, Magnus .
ORGANIZATION, 2006, 13 (03) :345-367
[5]  
Botzem S, 2006, TRANSNATIONAL GOVERNANCE: INSTITUTIONAL DYNAMICS OF REGULATION, P266
[6]  
Bowers D., 2006, Quality Progress, V39, P35
[7]  
Brunsson Nils., 2000, A World of Standards, P1
[8]  
Bryant A., 2007, ISO MANAGEMENT SYSTE, V7, P5
[9]   Stakeholder involvement in the design of US voluntary environmental programs: Does sponsorship matter? [J].
Carmin, J ;
Darnall, N ;
Mil-Homens, J .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2003, 31 (04) :527-543
[10]   Forest certification in developing and transitioning countries: Part of a sustainable future? [J].
Cashore, Benjamin ;
Gale, Fred ;
Meidinger, Errol ;
Newsom, Deanna .
ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 48 (09) :6-25