Randomized trial of a decision aid for individuals considering genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer risk

被引:49
作者
Wakefield, Claire E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meiser, Bettina [1 ,4 ]
Homewood, Judi [2 ]
Ward, Robyn [5 ]
O'Donnell, Sheridan [6 ]
Kirk, Judy [7 ]
机构
[1] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, PRG, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, Dept Psychol, N Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Sch Psychiat, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
[4] Univ New S Wales, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
[5] St Vincent Hosp, Family Canc Clin, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
[6] Hunter New England Hlth, Hunter Family Canc Serv, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[7] Westmead Hosp, Familial Canc Serv, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
关键词
hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; genetic testing; decision aid; patient education;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Despite the potential benefits of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) risk, individuals can find the genetic testing decision-making process complicated and challenging. The goal of the current study was to measure the effectiveness of a tailored decision aid designed specifically to assist individuals to make informed decisions regarding genetic testing for HNPCC risk. METHODS. In all, 153 individuals were randomized to receive the decision aid or a control pamphlet at the end of their first genetic Counseling consultation. Of these, 109 (71.2%) completed the first questionnaire I week after Consultation, whereas 95 (62.1%) completed the 6-month follow-up questionnaire. RESULTS. Although the decision aid had no significant effect on postdecisional regret or actual genetic testing decision, the trial results demonstrated that participants who received the decision aid had significantly lower levels of decisional conflict (ie, uncertainty) regarding genetic testing (chi-square(l) = 8.97; P =.003) and were more likely to be classified as having made an informed choice concerning genetic testing (Chi-square(1) = 4.37; P -.037) than participants who received a control pamphlet. Also, men who received the decision aid had significantly higher knowledge levels regarding genetic testing compared with men who received the control pamphlet, whereas no Such differences were found for women (chi-square(2) = 6.76; P =.034). CONCLUSIONS. A decision aid for individuals considering genetic testing for HNPCC is an effective intervention to reduce uncertainty and assist individuals to make an informed choice regarding genetic testing for HNPCC after genetic Counseling.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 965
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Patient preferences for medical decision making - Who really wants to participate? [J].
Arora, NK ;
McHorney, CA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (03) :335-341
[2]  
*AUSTR CANC NETW, 1999, GUID FAM ASP CANC
[3]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2006, AUSTR SOC TRENDS 200
[4]  
BARLOWSTEWART K, AUSTR GENETICS RESOU
[5]   Validation of a decision regret scale [J].
Brehaut, JC ;
O'Connor, AM ;
Wood, TJ ;
Hack, TF ;
Siminoff, L ;
Gordon, E ;
Feldman-Stewart, D .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) :281-292
[6]  
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[7]   ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance [J].
Davila, RE ;
Rajan, E ;
Baron, TH .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (04) :546-557
[8]   Decrease in mortality in Lynch syndrome families because of surveillance [J].
De Jong, AE ;
Hendriks, YMC ;
Kleibeuker, JH ;
De Boer, SY ;
Cats, A ;
Griffioen, G ;
Nagengast, FM ;
Nelis, FG ;
Rookus, MA ;
Vasen, HFA .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (03) :665-671
[9]   Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process [J].
Elwyn, Glyn ;
O'Connor, Annette ;
Stacey, Dawn ;
Volk, Robert ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Coulter, Angela ;
Thomson, Richard ;
Barrat, Alexandra ;
Butow, Phyllis ;
Barry, Michael ;
Mulley, Albert G. ;
Sepucha, Karen ;
Bernstein, Steven ;
Clarke, Aileen ;
Entwistle, Vikki ;
Feldman-Stewart, Deb ;
Holmes-Rovner, Margaret ;
Llewellyn-Thomas, Hilary ;
Moumjid, Nora ;
Ruland, Cornelia ;
Sykes, Alan ;
Whelan, Tim .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7565) :417-419
[10]   Juggling roles and expectations: Dilemmas faced by women talking to relatives about cancer and genetic testing [J].
Foster, C ;
Eeles, R ;
Ardern-Jones, A ;
Moynihan, C ;
Watson, M .
PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2004, 19 (04) :439-455