Digital Science and Knowledge Boundaries in Complex Innovation

被引:170
作者
Dougherty, Deborah [1 ]
Dunne, Danielle D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Business Sch, Dept Management & Global Business, Newark, NJ 07101 USA
[2] Fordham Univ, Sch Business, New York, NY 10019 USA
关键词
technology and innovation; organizational processes; organizing for innovation; TECHNOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; MODEL;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.1110.0700
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Drug discovery is a complex innovation process in which scientists need to make sense of ambiguous findings and grapple with numerous unpredictable interdependencies over many years of product development. Digitalization has combined with expanding science to address this complexity, creating new ways to measure, analyze, and model chemical compounds, diseases, and human biology. We interviewed 85 scientists and managers working on drug discovery to understand how they deal with complexity. We find a major knowledge fault line between digital scientists, who use computers as laboratories and manipulate signs, and therapy scientists, who use conventional laboratories and manipulate physical material. We build on research on epistemic cultures and knowing in practice to develop empirically grounded theory for the role of digital science in complex innovation. We propose that digitalization creates a new form of knowledge that provides essential complementary insights for complex innovation that cannot exist otherwise. However, digitalization also creates new knowledge boundaries that concern central activities of innovation. These boundaries highlight challenges of complex innovation that digital sciences can help address, but only if the innovation activities are transformed so that digital and therapy sciences can integrate their complementary knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:1467 / 1484
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[2]   Pharmaceutical matters - The invention of informed materials [J].
Barry, A .
THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2005, 22 (01) :51-+
[3]   Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor [J].
Bechky, BA .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (03) :312-330
[4]   INTEGRATING MODERNIST AND POSTMODERNIST PERSPECTIVES ON ORGANIZATIONS: A COMPLEXITY SCIENCE BRIDGE [J].
Boisot, Max ;
McKelvey, Bill .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (03) :415-433
[5]   Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction [J].
Boland, Richard J., Jr. ;
Lyytinen, Kalle ;
Yoo, Youngjin .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (04) :631-647
[6]   The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J].
Brown, SL ;
Eisenhardt, KM .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1997, 42 (01) :1-34
[7]  
Burns L.R., 2005, BUSINESS HEALTHCARE
[8]   Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (05) :555-568
[9]  
Cohen J, 2011, TECHNOL REV, V114, P40
[10]  
Cooper RG., 1998, Product Leadership: Creating And Launching Superior New Products