Brain stem auditory potentials evoked by clicks in the presence of high-pass filtered noise in dogs

被引:5
作者
Poncelet, L
Deltenre, P
Coppens, A
Michaux, C
Coussart, E
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Fac Med, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Free Univ Brussels, Hop Brugmann, Clin Neurophysiol Lab, B-1020 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
dog; BAEP; BAER; deafness; HPN masking;
D O I
10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.05.004
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the effects of a high-frequency hearing loss simulated by the high-pass-noise masking method, on the click-evoked brain stem-evoked potentials (BAEP) characteristics in dogs. BAEP were obtained in response to rarefaction and condensation click stimuli from 60 dB normal hearing level (NHL, corresponding to 89 dB sound pressure level) to wave V threshold, using steps of 5 dB in eleven 58 to 80-day-old Beagle puppies. Responses were added, providing an equivalent to alternate polarity clicks, and subtracted, providing the rarefaction-condensation potential (RCDP). The procedure was repeated while constant level, high-pass filtered (HPF) noise was superposed to the click. Cut-off frequencies of the Successively used filters were 8, 4 2 and 1 kHz. For each condition, wave V and RCDP thresholds, and slope of the wave V latency-intensity curve (LIC) were collected. The intensity range at which RCDP could not be recorded (pre-RCDP range) was calculated. Compared with the no noise condition, the pre-RCDP range significantly diminished and the wave V threshold significantly increased when the superposed HPF noise reached the 4 kHz area. Wave V LIC slope became significantly steeper with the 2 kHz HPF noise. In this non-invasive model of high-frequency hearing loss, impaired hearing of frequencies from 8 kHz and above escaped detection through click BAEP study in dogs. Frequencies above 13 kHz were however not specifically addressed in this study. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 174
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF BROAD-BAND NOISE ON THE HUMAN BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED-RESPONSE .2. FREQUENCY SPECIFICITY [J].
BURKARD, R ;
HECOX, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1983, 74 (04) :1214-1223
[2]   THE EFFECT OF BROAD-BAND NOISE ON THE HUMAN BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED-RESPONSE .1. RATE AND INTENSITY EFFECTS [J].
BURKARD, R ;
HECOX, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1983, 74 (04) :1204-1213
[3]  
DAVIS H, 1962, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, V71, P693
[4]  
DELTENRE P, 1995, AUDIOLOGY, V34, P17
[5]   A NEW DESCRIPTOR OF THE DUAL CHARACTER OF THE INPUT-OUTPUT BEHAVIOR OF THE COCHLEA, WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO ESTIMATION OF BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY POTENTIALS-EVOKED BY ALTERNATING POLARITY CLICKS [J].
DELTENRE, P ;
MANSBACH, AL .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 88 (05) :377-388
[6]   ANALYSIS OF CLICK-EVOKED BRAIN-STEM POTENTIALS IN MAN USING HIGH-PASS NOISE MASKING [J].
DON, M ;
EGGERMONT, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1978, 63 (04) :1084-1092
[7]  
DON M, 1979, ANN OTOL RHINOL LA S, V56, P1
[8]   ANALYSIS OF THE CLICK-EVOKED BRAIN-STEM POTENTIALS IN HUMANS USING HIGH-PASS NOISE MASKING .2. EFFECT OF CLICK INTENSITY [J].
EGGERMONT, JJ ;
DON, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1980, 68 (06) :1671-1675
[9]   ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES IN AUDIOLOGY AND OTOLOGY - SOME COMPARISONS BETWEEN AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE THRESHOLDS, LATENCIES, AND THE PURE-TONE AUDIOGRAM [J].
GORGA, MP ;
WORTHINGTON, DW ;
REILAND, JK ;
BEAUCHAINE, KA ;
GOLDGAR, DE .
EAR AND HEARING, 1985, 6 (02) :105-112
[10]   EFFECT OF BROAD-BAND NOISE ON THE HUMAN-BRAIN STEM AUDITORY EVOKED-RESPONSE [J].
HECOX, KE ;
PATTERSON, J ;
BIRMAN, M .
EAR AND HEARING, 1989, 10 (06) :346-353