The analysis of feature-based measurement error in coordinate metrology

被引:13
作者
Huang, WZ [1 ]
Kong, ZY
Ceglarek, D
Brahmst, E
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Ind Engn, 1513 Univ Ave, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Ctr Automot Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48113 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/07408170490274205
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Coordinate measurement systems (CMSs) dominate the dimensional control and diagnostics of various manufacturing processes. However, CMSs have inherent errors caused by the lack of a tracing ability for some of the measured part features. This is important for product inspection and process variation reduction in a number of automated manufacturing systems, such as for example the automotive body assembly process. The lack of a feature tracing ability means that instead of measuring a given feature, the CMS may actually measure the area around the selected feature. In this paper, a principle for the part feature tracing ability and the resultant feature-based measurement error analysis are developed to estimate the aforementioned deficiencies in the CMSs. The impact of feature type and part(s) positional variation on the feature-based measurement error is explored. The proposed approach is applicable to both contact and non-contact CMSs including both mechanical and optical coordinate measuring machines. An analysis of the error for different measurement algorithms is presented. We show that the developed feature-based measurement error can have a significant impact on the measurement accuracy and hence on process control and the diagnostic algorithms currently used in manufacturing. A feature-based error map and error compensation approach are also developed and presented. Simulations, experimental results and two industrial case studies illustrate the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 251
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ABBE M, 2000, P IMEKO 2000 INT MEA, P180
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, GUID EXPR UNC MEAS G
[3]  
Asada H., 1985, IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, VRA-1, P86
[4]  
Bosch J. A., 1995, Coordinate Measuring Machines and Systems
[5]  
Bryan J., 1990, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, V39, P645, DOI [10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63001-7, DOI 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63001-7, 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63001-7]
[6]   Knowledge-based diagnostic approach for the launch of the auto-body assembly process [J].
Ceglarek, D. ;
Shi, J. ;
Wu, S.M. .
Journal of engineering for industry, 1994, 116 (04) :491-499
[7]   Fixture failure diagnosis for autobody assembly using pattern recognition [J].
Ceglarek, D ;
Shi, J .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1996, 118 (01) :55-66
[8]  
Ceglarek D., 1995, Manufacturing Review Journal, V8, P139
[9]   Multivariate analysis and evaluation of adaptive sheet metal assembly systems [J].
Ceglarek, DJ .
CIRP ANNALS 1998 - MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, VOL 47, NO 1, 1998, 47 :17-22
[10]  
*DEA, 1992, MASTER MEASURING SYS