Setting priorities for research in medical nutrition education: an international approach

被引:8
|
作者
Ball, Lauren [1 ,2 ]
Barnes, Katelyn [1 ]
Laur, Celia [2 ,3 ]
Crowley, Jennifer [2 ,4 ]
Ray, Sumantra [2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Cambridge, Need Nutr Educ Innovat Programme, MRC Elsie Widdowson Lab, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Waterloo, Fac Appl Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Hlth Syst, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2016年 / 6卷 / 12期
关键词
HEALTH RESEARCH; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; CHILD HEALTH; STUDENTS; CARE; BEHAVIORS; ATTITUDES; GUIDELINES; CURRICULUM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013241
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To identify the research priorities for medical nutrition education worldwide. Design: A 5-step stakeholder engagement process based on methodological guidelines for identifying research priorities in health. Participants: 277 individuals were identified as representatives for 30 different stakeholder organisations across 86 countries. The stakeholder organisations represented the views of medical educators, medical students, doctors, patients and researchers in medical education. Interventions: Each stakeholder representative was asked to provide up to three research questions that should be deemed as a priority for medical nutrition education. Main outcome measures: Research questions were critically appraised for answerability, sustainability, effectiveness, potential for translation and potential to impact on disease burden. A blinded scoring system was used to rank the appraised questions, with higher scores indicating higher priority (range of scores possible 36-108). Results: 37 submissions were received, of which 25 were unique research questions. Submitted questions received a range of scores from 62 to 106 points. The highest scoring questions focused on (1) increasing the confidence of medical students and doctors in providing nutrition care to patients, (2) clarifying the essential nutrition skills doctors should acquire, (3) understanding the effectiveness of doctors at influencing dietary behaviours and (4) improving medical students' attitudes towards the importance of nutrition. Conclusions: These research questions can be used to ensure future projects in medical nutrition education directly align with the needs and preferences of research stakeholders. Funders should consider these priorities in their commissioning of research.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] "Zoom"ing to the Kitchen: A Novel Approach to Virtual Nutrition Education for Medical Trainees
    Charles, Justin A.
    Wood, Nathan I.
    Neary, Stephanie
    Moreno, Jorge O.
    Scierka, Lindsey
    Brink, Benjamin
    Zhao, Xiwen
    Gielissen, Katherine A.
    NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [2] Nutrition education in medical school: a time of opportunity
    Kushner, Robert F.
    Van Horn, Linda
    Rock, Cheryl L.
    Edwards, Marilyn S.
    Bales, Connie W.
    Kohlmeier, Martin
    Akabas, Sharon R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2014, 99 (05) : 1167S - 1173S
  • [3] Proceedings of the inaugural International Summit for Medical Nutrition Education and Research
    Laur, C.
    Ball, L.
    Ahankari, A. S.
    Avdagovska, M.
    Crowley, J.
    Deen, D.
    Douglas, P.
    Hark, L.
    Kohlmeier, M.
    Luzi, L.
    McCotter, L.
    Martyn, K.
    Nowson, C.
    Wall, C.
    Ray, S.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 140 : 59 - 67
  • [4] Perspective: Consideration of Values When Setting Priorities in Nutrition Research: Guidance for Transparency
    Hawwash, Dana
    Pinxten, Wim
    Bonn, Noemie Aubert
    Verstraeten, Roosmarijn
    Kolsteren, Patrick
    Lachat, Carl
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2018, 9 (06) : 671 - 687
  • [5] The state of nutrition in medical education in the United States
    Bassin, Sandhya R.
    Al-Nimr, Rima, I
    Allen, Kathleen
    Ogrinc, Greg
    NUTRITION REVIEWS, 2020, 78 (09) : 764 - 780
  • [6] Setting priorities for health education research: A mixed methods study
    Palermo, Claire
    King, Olivia
    Brock, Tina
    Brown, Ted
    Crampton, Paul
    Hall, Helen
    Macaulay, Janet
    Morphet, Julia
    Mundy, Matthew
    Oliaro, Louise
    Paynter, Sophie
    Williams, Brett
    Wright, Caroline
    Rees, Charlotte E.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2019, 41 (09) : 1029 - 1038
  • [7] Setting priorities for research
    Fleurence, RL
    Torgerson, DJ
    HEALTH POLICY, 2004, 69 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [8] Nutrition in medical education: a systematic review
    Crowley, Jennifer
    Ball, Lauren
    Hiddink, Gerrit Jan
    LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2019, 3 (09) : E379 - E389
  • [9] A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO DESIGNING MULTI-MODALITY EDUCATION IN A MEDICAL RESEARCH SETTING
    Hansen, Kim
    INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 7627 - 7635
  • [10] Nutrition competencies for undergraduate medical education: Results of an international interdisciplinary consensus
    Cardenas, Diana
    Diaz, Gustavo
    Fuchs-Tarlovsky, Vanessa
    Cristina Gonzalez, Maria
    Carrazco, Fernando
    Perez Cano, Angelica Maria
    Bermudez, Charles
    Maza, Claudia
    Ferraresi, Eduardo
    Lipovestky, Fernando
    Villafana, Haydee
    Arenas-Marquez, Humberto
    Calvo, Isabel
    Alvarez Cordova, Ludwig Roberto
    Canicoba, Marisa
    Sanchez, Paola
    Santana, Sergio
    Tihista, Serrana
    Adrianza de Baptista, Gertrudis M.
    Garcia, Yawelida
    Toulson Davisson Correia, Maria Isabel
    JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND ENTERAL NUTRITION, 2022, 46 (03) : 635 - 645