ASSESSMENT OF PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS USEFUL IN SCREENING FOR TOLERANCE TO SOIL DROUGHT IN WINTER WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) GENOTYPES

被引:0
作者
Zivcak, Marek [1 ]
Brestic, Marian [1 ]
Olsovska, Katarina [1 ]
机构
[1] Slovak Univ Agr, Dept Plant Physiol, Fac Agrobiol & Food Resources, Nitra 94976, Slovakia
关键词
winter wheat; soil drought; photosynthesis; osmotic adjustment; transpiration efficiency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Application of physiological methods in selection process may help considerably to improve wheat breeding efficiency. In vegetation pot experiments with a collection of winter bread wheat genotypes of different provenance the drought tolerance screening methods were applied. Evaluation of drought effect in selected genotypes by chlorophyll fluorescence was based on the performance index (PI), the most sensitive fluorescence parameter characterizing better the drought susceptibility of plants. The genotypes differed in sensitivity of stomatal closure, and hence in the CO2 assimilation rate. In drought conditions the delayed stomatal closure caused mainly by higher osmotic adjustment led to higher net assimilation rate and higher production of assimilates. Similarly, transpiration efficiency of non-stressed plants was also related to their better drought tolerance. We identified several parameters well-correlated with relative grain yield decrease in drought stress conditions. Results were statistically significant for phenology and stomatal conductance of non-stressed plants, but we identified as promising also measurements of transpiration efficiency, osmotic adjustment and fast fluorescence kinetics using performance index as the most sensitive parameter.
引用
收藏
页码:1943 / 1946
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals:: What should we breed for? [J].
Araus, JL ;
Slafer, GA ;
Reynolds, MP ;
Royo, C .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2002, 89 :925-940
[2]   Effect of heat and drought stress on the photosynthetic processes of wheat [J].
Balla, K ;
Bedö, Z ;
Veisz, O .
CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2006, 34 (01) :381-384
[3]   Consistent differences among wheat cultivars in osmotic adjustment and their relationship to plant production [J].
Blum, A ;
Zhang, JX ;
Nguyen, HT .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1999, 64 (03) :287-291
[4]  
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[5]  
Czovek P., 2006, Acta Agronomica Hungarica, V54, P49, DOI 10.1556/AAgr.54.2006.1.5
[6]   DROUGHT RESISTANCE IN SPRING WHEAT CULTIVARS .1. GRAIN-YIELD RESPONSES [J].
FISCHER, RA ;
MAURER, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1978, 29 (05) :897-912
[7]   Metabolic implications of stress-induced proline accumulation in plants [J].
Hare, PD ;
Cress, WA .
PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 1997, 21 (02) :79-102
[8]  
Strasser R.J., 2000, PROBING PHOTOSYNTHES, P445, DOI DOI 10.1134/S0006297914040014