The treatment of elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: Feasibility and efficacy of an intensive multidrug regimen

The results of a prospective trial of an 8 week treatment for elderly patients with advanced intermadiate-high grade NHL are reported. Our aim was to reduce general toxicity without losing an anti-lymphoma effect. For this reason the use of growth factor was studied. We also analysed the behaviour of different histological groups (E + F vs G + H). From November 1991 to November 1993 100 patients older than 65 years with combination intermediate-high grade advanced stage NHL were treated with the P-VEBEC regimen, an original including epirubicin 50 mg/sqm, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/sqm and etoposide 100 mg/sqm on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7; vinblastine 5 mg/sqm and bleomycin 5 mg/sqm on weeks 2, 4, 6, 8; prednisone 50 mg/sqm/day per os in the first two weeks and thereafter every other day .46 pts received rG-CSF 5 mu g/Kg/day throughout the treatment starting on day 2 of every week for 4 consecutive days. Twenty eight pts had B symptoms, 41 had bulky disease, 37 LDH levels above normal, 50 stage IV patients and 30 had bone marrow involvement. Sixty two percent achieved a complete remission (CR). Adverse prognostic factors for CR were E and F histology, stage IV disease, bone marrow infiltration, serum LDH levels above normal, international Prognostic Index (I.I.) intermediate-high and high risk categories and relative dose intensity (RDI) less than 0.80. Severe toxicity was rarely recorded and only one toxic death was observed. With a median follow-up of 33 months OS, DFS and EFS were 44%, 60% and 30% respectively. EFS was influenced by stage, BM involvement, level of LDH and I.I. intermediate-high and high risks. The 52 patients with DLCL (diffuse large cell lymphomas-G + H according to WF) did better with a higher CR, OS, DFS and EFS rates, than the other WF subtypes. In conclusion P-VEBEC is a feasible combination to use in elderly patients, mainly in DLCL. The use of rG-CSF improves the RDI. A RDI > 0.80 could play a role in improving the outcome, expecially in patients with adverse prognostic factors. For other subgroups another schedule is probably justified.