Operating mode selection for the separation of intermediately-eluting components with countercurrent and centrifugal partition chromatography

被引:13
作者
Morley, Raena [1 ]
Minceva, Mirjana [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Biothermodynam, TUM Sch Life Sci Weihenstephan, Maximus von Imhof Forum 2, D-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
关键词
Countercurrent chromatography; Centrifugal partition chromatography; Model-based design; Intermediately-eluting component; Ternary separation; PREPARATIVE ISOLATION; CURRENT EXTRACTION; PURIFICATION; EFFICIENCY; DURATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2019.02.020
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Two operating modes that can be used for the separation of intermediately-eluting target components from complex mixtures using solid support-free liquid-liquid chromatography (LLC) include batch injections and trapping multiple dual mode (trapping MDM). Batch injections offer the advantage of simpler equipment and process design, while the trapping MDM process, although more complex, can provide improved resolution at low separation factors. In this study, a thorough comparison of batch injection and trapping MDM performance with respect to productivity is made using simulations for a wide range of separation tasks (target component/impurity separation factors; minimum purity and yield requirements). For each separation task, the maximum productivities obtained by the two operating modes were separately determined with respect to their independent parameters. The results indicate that trapping MDM can be used to extend the application of LLC down to separation factors as low as 1.1, with its use being most advantageous for separation factors of approximately 1.3. However, the simpler batch injection process remains preferable for separation factors around or greater than 1.5. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 148
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Berthod A, 2002, COMP ANAL C, V38, P1, DOI 10.1016/S0166-526X(02)80004-6
[2]   Countercurrent chromatography: People and applications [J].
Berthod, A. ;
Ruiz-Angel, M. J. ;
Carda-Broch, S. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2009, 1216 (19) :4206-4217
[3]   Preparative separation of gambogic acid and its C-2 epimer using recycling high-speed counter-current chromatography [J].
Bin Han, Quan ;
Song, Jing Zheng ;
Qiao, Chun Feng ;
Wong, Lina ;
Xu, Hong Xi .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1127 (1-2) :298-301
[4]   Multiple dual-mode centrifugal partition chromatography, a semi-continuous development mode for routine laboratory-scale purifications [J].
Delannay, Eldra ;
Toribio, Alix ;
Boudesocque, Leslie ;
Nuzillard, Jean-Marc ;
Zeches-Hanrot, Monique ;
Dardennes, Emmanuel ;
Le Dour, Gwennael ;
Sapi, Janos ;
Renault, Jean-Hugues .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1127 (1-2) :45-51
[5]   Recycling high-speed countercurrent chromatography for separation of taxol and cephalomannine [J].
Du, QZ ;
Ke, CQ ;
Ito, Y .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 1998, 21 (1-2) :157-162
[6]   Heart-Cut Two-Dimensional Countercurrent Chromatography with a Single Instrument [J].
Englert, Michael ;
Brown, Leslie ;
Vetter, Walter .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 87 (20) :10172-10177
[7]   GUESS - A generally useful estimate of solvent systems in CCC [J].
Friesen, JB ;
Pauli, GF .
JOURNAL OF LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY & RELATED TECHNOLOGIES, 2005, 28 (17) :2777-2806
[8]   Effect of operating parameters on a centrifugal partition chromatography separation [J].
Fumat, Norbert ;
Berthod, Alain ;
Faure, Karine .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2016, 1474 :47-58
[9]   Trapping multiple dual mode centrifugal partition chromatography for the separation of intermediately-eluting components: Operating parameter selection [J].
Goll, Johannes ;
Morley, Raena ;
Minceva, Mirjana .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2017, 1496 :68-79
[10]   Online-storage recycling counter-current chromatography for preparative isolation of naphthaquinones from Arnebia euchroma (Royle) Johnst [J].
He, Jian-Ming ;
Zhang, Shi-Yue ;
Mu, Qing .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2016, 1464 :79-86