Lidocaine/tetracaine peel in topical anesthesia prior to laser-assisted hair removal: Phase-II and Phase-III study results

被引:17
作者
Alster, Tina [1 ]
Garden, Jerome [2 ]
Fitzpatrick, Richard [3 ]
Rendon, Marta [4 ]
Sarkany, Marlis [5 ]
Adelglass, Jeffrey [6 ]
机构
[1] Washington Inst Dermatol Laser Surg, Washington, DC 20005 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Dermatol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Goldman Butterwick Fitzpatrick & Groff, Cosmet Laser Dermatol, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Rendon Ctr Dermatol & Aesthet Med, Boca Raton, FL USA
[5] Galderma Int, La Def, France
[6] SKINTAST Med & Surg Rejuvenat Ctr, Plano, TX USA
关键词
topical anesthetic; laser-assisted hair removal; lidocaine; tetracaine; LIDOCAINE;
D O I
10.3109/09546634.2012.715240
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Patient comfort is essential during dermatologic procedures. Objectives: To evaluate anesthetic efficacy in laser-assisted hair removal of a self-occluding topical anesthetic (lidocaine 70mg/g and tetracaine 70mg/g, "LT peel"), which air-dries and can be peeled off 30 min post-application. Methods: Studies A (Phase-II) and B (Phase-III) were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and paired. Applications of LT peel and placebo were concurrent: in Study A, 60 subjects were randomized to 30, 45, or 60-min groups, and in Study B, 50 subjects had 30-min applications. After drug removal, the investigator assessed for erythema, edema, and blanching. Efficacy evaluations followed the procedure: subject's pain [Visual Analog Scale (VAS), no to worst pain (0 - 100)], subject's/investigator's impression of anesthetic adequacy, and investigator's pain ratings. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: VAS scores were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for LT peel: mean scores were 26.7 for LT Peel vs. 44.3 for placebo (Study A total population, similar between application times) and 23 vs. 31.7 (Study B), respectively. For both studies, subject's/investigator's ratings favored LT peel (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Mild skin reactions occurred more frequently for LT peel. Conclusions: After a 30-min application, LT peel was effective and well-tolerated in providing anesthesia for laser-assisted hair removal.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 177
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   The Lidocaine/Tetracaine peel: A novel topical anesthetic for dermatologic procedures in adult patients [J].
Alster, Tina S. .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2007, 33 (09) :1073-1081
[2]  
American Society of Plastic Surgeons (Hrsg), 2011, PLAST SURG STAT REP
[3]   Thirty-minute application of the S-Caine Peel prior to nonablative laser treatment [J].
Doshi, SN ;
Friedman, PM ;
Marquez, DK ;
Goldberg, LH .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2003, 29 (10) :1008-1011
[4]   Comparative study of the efficacy of four topical anesthetics [J].
Friedman, PM ;
Fogelman, JP ;
Nouri, K ;
Levine, VJ ;
Ashinoff, R .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1999, 25 (12) :950-954
[5]   Evidence-based review of hair removal using lasers and light sources [J].
Haedersdal, M ;
Wulf, HC .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) :9-20
[6]  
Huber K, 1998, Dermatol Nurs, V10, P427
[7]   Topical anesthetic creams [J].
Kaweski, Susan .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (06) :2161-2165
[8]  
Ogden L, 2008, INT J DERMATOL, V47, P87, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03331.x
[9]   Effect of 4% Topical Lidocaine Applied to the Face on the Serum Levels of Lidocaine and Its Metabolite, Monoethylglycinexylidide [J].
Oni, Georgette ;
Brown, Spencer ;
Burrus, Clint ;
Grant, Lorin ;
Watkins, Jeff ;
Kenkel, Matthew ;
Barton, Fritz, Jr. ;
Kenkel, Jeffrey .
AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2010, 30 (06) :853-858
[10]  
Sarkany M, 2012, IMCAS 2012 14 INT MA