Research Directions in Agent Communication

被引:14
作者
Chopra, Amit K. [1 ]
Artikis, Alexander
Bentahar, Jamal
Colombetti, Marco [2 ,3 ]
Dignum, Frank [4 ]
Fornara, Nicoletta [2 ]
Jones, Andrew J. I. [5 ]
Singh, Munindar P. [6 ]
Yolum, Pinar [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trento, Trento, Italy
[2] Univ Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland
[3] Politecn Milan, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Utrecht, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Kings Coll London, London, England
[6] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[7] Bogazici Univ, TR-80815 Bebek, Turkey
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Theory; Communication; EXECUTABLE SPECIFICATION; ARCHITECTURE; ADAPTATION; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1145/2438653.2438655
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Increasingly, software engineering involves open systems consisting of autonomous and heterogeneous participants or agents who carry out loosely coupled interactions. Accordingly, understanding and specifying communications among agents is a key concern. A focus on ways to formalize meaning distinguishes agent communication from traditional distributed computing: meaning provides a basis for flexible interactions and compliance checking. Over the years, a number of approaches have emerged with some essential and some irrelevant distinctions drawn among them. As agent abstractions gain increasing traction in the software engineering of open systems, it is important to resolve the irrelevant and highlight the essential distinctions, so that future research can be focused in the most productive directions. This article is an outcome of extensive discussions among agent communication researchers, aimed at taking stock of the field and at developing, criticizing, and refining their positions on specific approaches and future challenges. This article serves some important purposes, including identifying (1) points of broad consensus; (2) points where substantive differences remain; and (3) interesting directions of future work.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
ALDEWERELD H, 2007, THESIS U UTRECHT
[2]  
Aldewereld H, 2006, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V3913, P231, DOI 10.1007/11775331_16
[3]   Modelling dialogues using argumentation [J].
Amgoud, L ;
Maudet, N ;
Parsons, S .
FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, :31-38
[4]  
Amgoud L, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4183, P13
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, P 2 INT JOINT C AUT, DOI [10.1145/860575.860659, DOI 10.1145/860575.860659]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1986, UNDERSTANDING COMPUT
[7]  
Artikis A., 2009, P INT WORKSH COORD O, P93
[8]   An executable specification of a formal argumentation protocol [J].
Artikis, Alexander ;
Sergot, Marek ;
Pitt, Jeremy .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 171 (10-15) :776-804
[9]   Executable specification of open multi-agent systems [J].
Artikis, Alexander ;
Sergot, Marek .
LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL, 2010, 18 (01) :31-65
[10]   A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action [J].
Atkinson, K ;
Bench-Capon, T ;
Mcburney, P .
AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2005, 11 (02) :153-171