The mean diffusivity of forceps minor is useful to distinguish amnestic mild cognitive impairment from mild cognitive impairment caused by cerebral small vessel disease

ObjectivesIn recent years, the desire to make a more fine-grained identification on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has become apparent, the etiological diagnosis of MCI in particular. Nevertheless, new methods for the etiological diagnosis of MCI are currently insufficient. The objective of this study was to establish discriminative measures for amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) and MCI caused by cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). Materials and methodsIn total, 20 normal controls (NCs), 33 a-MCI patients, and 25 CSVD-MCI patients performed comprehensive neuropsychological assessments concerning global cognitive function and five cognitive domains as well as magnetic resonance imaging scan with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Diffusion parameters including fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity of 20 major white matter metrics were obtained by ROI-based analyses. The neuropsychological tests and diffusion measurements were compared and binary logistic regression was used to identify the best differential indicator for the two MCI subgroups. The discriminating power was calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis. ResultsAmnestic mild cognitive impairment group showed significant impairment in memory and language function, while CSVD-MCI group revealed more deficits in multi-cognitive domains of memory, language, attention and executive function than controls. Compared to the a-MCI, CSVD-MCI was significantly dysfunctional in the executive function. The CSVD-MCI group had decreased fractional anisotropy and increased mean diffusivity values throughout widespread white matter areas. CSVD-MCI presented more severe damage in the anterior thalamic radiation, forceps major, forceps minor and right inferior longitudinal fasciculus compared with a-MCI group. No significant neuropsychological tests were found in the binary logistic regression model, yet the DTI markers showed a higher discriminative power than the neuropsychological tests. The Stroop test errors had moderate potential (AUC = 0.747; sensitivity = 76.0%; specificity = 63.6%; P = 0.001; 95% CI: 0.617-0.877), and the mean diffusivity value of forceps minor demonstrated the highest predictive power to discriminate each MCI subtype (AUC = 0.815; sensitivity = 88.0%; specificity = 72.7%; P < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.698-0.932). ConclusionThe mean diffusivity of forceps minor may serve as an optimal indicator to differentiate between a-MCI and CSVD-MCI.