Considering different water supplies can improve the accuracyof the WOFOST crop model and remote sensing assimilation in predicting wheat yield

被引:2
作者
Xu, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Shuaijie [2 ]
Gao, Feng [2 ]
Wang, Jian [1 ]
Ma, Xinming [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Shuping [2 ]
Fan, Zehua [2 ]
机构
[1] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Management Sci, Zhengzhou 450002, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Agron, Zhengzhou 450002, Peoples R China
关键词
wheat; crop model; remote sensing; data assimilation; yield forecast; water restriction; LEAF-AREA INDEX; KALMAN FILTER; GROWTH-MODEL; LANDSAT; SERIES; LIGHT; ASAR; LAI;
D O I
10.31545/intagr/154892
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The study was carried out in order to clarify the effects of different water and irrigation conditions on crop models and remote sensing assimilation results. It involved taking winter wheat from 17 test sites in Henan Province as the research object and calibrating the World Food Studies model. The ensemble Kalman filter algorithm was used to calibrate the two modes and Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer-Leaf Area Index of the calibrated world food studies model. The study found that the average error of the world food studies model for simulating flowering and maturity periods is within 2 days, the R2 of the leaf area index calibration results is between 0.87-0.98, and the R2 and root mean square error of the verification results are 0.77 and 1.06 respectively. Under the latent model, the R2 of the world food studies model taking account of the water supply situation and the assimilation results without taking account of the water supply situation are 0.50 and 0.48, respectively. In the water restric-tion mode, the R2 increased from 0.79 to 0.86 compared with the assimilation results where the water supply was not considered. The results show that: depending on the water supply of different regions, selecting the corresponding assimilation parameters can effectively improve the prediction accuracy of crop models and remote sensing assimilation for wheat yields under different water and irrigation conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 349
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Akbar Hossain Akbar Hossain, 2012, Notulae Scientia Biologicae, V4, P97
[2]   Evaluation of NASA Satellite- and Model-Derived Weather Data for Simulation of Maize Yield Potential in China [J].
Bai, Jinshun ;
Chen, Xinping ;
Dobermann, Achim ;
Yang, Haishun ;
Cassman, Kenneth G. ;
Zhang, Fusuo .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2010, 102 (01) :9-16
[3]   Assimilation of Remotely-Sensed LAI into WOFOST Model with the SUBPLEX Algorithm for Improving the Field-Scale Jujube Yield Forecasts [J].
Bai, Tiecheng ;
Wang, Shanggui ;
Meng, Wenbo ;
Zhang, Nannan ;
Wang, Tao ;
Chen, Youqi ;
Mercatoris, Benoit .
REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (16)
[4]  
CHARNEY J, 1969, J ATMOS SCI, V26, P1160, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<1160:UOIHDT>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   A simple method for reconstructing a high-quality NDVI time-series data set based on the Savitzky-Golay filter [J].
Chen, J ;
Jönsson, P ;
Tamura, M ;
Gu, ZH ;
Matsushita, B ;
Eklundh, L .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 91 (3-4) :332-344
[7]   Potential performances of remotely sensed LAI assimilation in WOFOST model based on an OSS Experiment [J].
Curnel, Yannick ;
de Wit, Allard J. W. ;
Duveiller, Gregory ;
Defourny, Pierre .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2011, 151 (12) :1843-1855
[8]   Crop model data assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman filter for improving regional crop yield forecasts [J].
de Wit, A. M. ;
van Diepen, C. A. .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2007, 146 (1-2) :38-56
[9]   25 years of the WOFOST cropping systems model [J].
de Wit, Allard ;
Boogaard, Hendrik ;
Fumagalli, Davide ;
Janssen, Sander ;
Knapen, Rob ;
van Kraalingen, Daniel ;
Supit, Iwan ;
van der Wijngaart, Raymond ;
van Diepen, Kees .
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 168 :154-167
[10]   Estimating regional winter wheat yield with WOFOST through the assimilation of green area index retrieved from MODIS observations [J].
de Wit, Allard ;
Duveiller, Gregory ;
Defourny, Pierre .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2012, 164 :39-52