A novel approach for calculating the item discrimination for Likert type of scales

被引:5
作者
Celen, Umit [1 ]
Aybek, Eren Can [2 ]
机构
[1] Amasya Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Educ Sci, Amasya, Turkey
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Fac Educ, Dept Educ Sci, Denizli, Turkey
关键词
Item discrimination index; Likert-type scale; Exploratory factor  analysis; Slope coefficient; Monte-Carlo simulation;
D O I
10.21449/ijate.1173356
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Item analysis is performed by developers as an integral part of the scale development process. Thus, items are excluded from the scale depending on the item analysis prior to the factor analysis. Existing item discrimination indices are calculated based on correlation, yet items with different response patterns are likely to have a similar item discrimination index. This study proposed a new item discrimination index that can be used in Likert type of scales and examined its effect on factor analysis results. For this purpose, simulative datasets were generated, and items were excluded from the analysis according to the .20, .30 and .35 item discrimination index criteria, and exploratory factor analysis was performed for a single factor. Accordingly, it was found that more variance could be explained by a single factor with fewer items compared to other discrimination indices when the .20 criterion of the slope coefficient was used as suggested in this study. Similar findings were obtained using the .35 criterion with other discrimination indices. In this context, it is recommended to use the slope coefficient as an additional discrimination index calculation method in the scale development process.
引用
收藏
页码:772 / 786
页数:15
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ADV HUMAN ASSESSMENT
[2]   MONTE-CARLO COMPARISON OF 10 ITEM DISCRIMINATION INDEXES [J].
BEUCHERT, AK ;
MENDOZA, JL .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1979, 16 (02) :109-117
[3]  
Crocker L. M., 2008, Introduction to classical and modern test theory
[4]   Examining the Discrimination of Binary Scored Test Items with ROC Analysis [J].
Cum, Sait .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2021, 8 (04) :948-958
[5]   A COMPARISON OF SEVERAL ITEM DISCRIMINATION INDEXES [J].
ENGELHART, MD .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 1965, 2 (01) :69-76
[6]  
Johnson A.P., 1951, J EDUC PSYCHOL, V42, P499
[7]   The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items [J].
Kelley, TL .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1939, 30 :17-24
[8]  
Livingston S.A., 2004, GRAPHICAL APPROACH I
[9]  
Magis D, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V48, P1
[10]  
Martinková P, 2018, R J, V10, P503