Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis

被引:10
作者
Gandara-Cortes, Marina [1 ,2 ]
Vazquez-Boquete, Angel [3 ]
Fernandez-Rodriguez, Beatriz [3 ]
Viano, Patricia [3 ]
Insua, Dora [3 ]
Seoane-Seoane, Alejandro [3 ]
Gude, Francisco [4 ]
Gallego, Rosalia [1 ]
Fraga, Maximo [3 ]
Antunez, Jose R. [3 ]
Curiel, Teresa [5 ]
Perez-Lopez, Eva [6 ]
Garcia-Caballero, Tomas [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Sch Med, Dept Morphol Sci, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[2] Alvaro Cunqueiro Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Vigo, Spain
[3] Univ Clin Hosp, Dept Pathol, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[4] Univ Clin Hosp, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[5] Univ Clin Hosp, Dept Oncol, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
[6] Univ Hosp Ourense, Dept Oncol, Orense, Spain
关键词
Breast cancer; 4-IHC; Image analysis; Biological subtypes; INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; POPULATION-BASED COHORT; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; PRIMARY THERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; CLASSIFICATION; KI-67; KI67;
D O I
10.1007/s00428-017-2194-z
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Surrogate classification of intrinsic subtypes of invasive carcinomas by combined immunohistochemistry for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki67 (4-IHC) has increased steadily since the 2011 St Gallen symposium, due to its rapid subtyping of tumors at a reasonable cost. An important step in improving 4-IHC reproducibility and reliability will be to provide reference values from the routine use of standardized 4-IHC followed by image analysis. The aims of the current study were (1) to analyze invasive breast carcinomas using standardized 4-IHC and quantitative image analysis and (2) to compare the results obtained in the classification of biological subtypes using current Ki67 and PR threshold values proposed by different authors to sub-classifying the luminal A-like and the luminal B-like (HER2-negative) subtypes. Five hundred twenty-one tumors were analyzed by standardized immunohistochemistry, with automatic image analysis, and HER2 FISH technique. Positivity for ER was found in 82.7% and for PR in 70.1% of cases. Using the Allred scoring system, hormone receptor results showed a bimodal distribution, particularly for ER. HER2 positivity was found in 15.7% of cases, and the mean Ki67 score was 32.3%. Using the most recently proposed surrogate definitions for the classification of luminal breast cancer subtypes, the percentages of different subtypes that we found were similar to those published with genomic platforms: 40.7% luminal A-like, 32.4% luminal B-like/HER2-negative, 9.8% luminal B-like/HER2-positive, 6.0% HER2-positive, and 11.1% triple negative. Standardized 4-IHC with automatic image analysis constitutes a low-cost method for surrogate definitions of biological subtypes of breast cancer that delivers accurate results in a day.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis
    Marina Gándara-Cortes
    Ángel Vázquez-Boquete
    Beatriz Fernández-Rodríguez
    Patricia Viaño
    Dora Ínsua
    Alejandro Seoane-Seoane
    Francisco Gude
    Rosalía Gallego
    Máximo Fraga
    José R. Antúnez
    Teresa Curiel
    Eva Pérez-López
    Tomás García-Caballero
    Virchows Archiv, 2018, 472 : 195 - 203
  • [2] Automated assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer: the utility of digital image analysis using virtual triple staining and whole slide imaging
    Hida, Akira, I
    Omanovic, Dzenita
    Pedersen, Lars
    Oshiro, Yumi
    Ogura, Takashi
    Nomura, Tsunehisa
    Kurebayashi, Junichi
    Kanomata, Naoki
    Moriya, Takuya
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 77 (03) : 471 - 480
  • [3] 4-IHC classification of breast cancer subtypes in a large cohort of a clinical cancer registry: use in clinical routine for therapeutic decisions and its effect on survival
    Inwald, Elisabeth Christine
    Koller, M.
    Klinkhammer-Schalke, M.
    Zeman, F.
    Hofstaedter, F.
    Gerstenhauer, M.
    Brockhoff, G.
    Ortmann, O.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 153 (03) : 647 - 658
  • [4] Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Breast Cancer Subtype: Does Subtype Change and, if so, How?: IHC Profile and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    De la Cruz, Lucy M.
    Harhay, Michael O.
    Zhang, Paul
    Ugras, Stacy
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (12) : 3535 - 3540
  • [5] Digital image analysis outperforms manual biomarker assessment in breast cancer
    Stalhammar, Gustav
    Martinez, Nelson Fuentes
    Lippert, Michael
    Tobin, Nicholas P.
    Molholm, Ida
    Kis, Lorand
    Rosin, Gustaf
    Rantalainen, Mattias
    Pedersen, Lars
    Bergh, Jonas
    Grunkin, Michael
    Hartman, Johan
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 29 (04) : 318 - 329
  • [6] Reliability and Variability of Ki-67 Digital Image Analysis Methods for Clinical Diagnostics in Breast Cancer
    Dawe, Melanie
    Shi, Wei
    Liu, Tian Y.
    Lajkosz, Katherine
    Shibahara, Yukiko
    Gopal, Nakita E. K.
    Geread, Rokshana
    Mirjahanmardi, Seyed
    Wei, Carrie X.
    Butt, Sehrish
    Abdalla, Moustafa
    Manolescu, Sabrina
    Liang, Sheng-Ben
    Chadwick, Dianne
    Roehrl, Michael H. A.
    McKee, Trevor D.
    Adeoye, Adewunmi
    McCready, David
    Khademi, April
    Liu, Fei-Fei
    Fyles, Anthony
    Done, Susan J.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2024, 104 (05)
  • [7] A Clinicopathological Analysis of Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer using Immunohistochemical Surrogates: A 6-Year Institutional Experience from a Tertiary Cancer Center in North India
    Somal, Puneet Kaur
    Sancheti, Sankalp
    Sharma, Aishwarya
    Sali, Akash Pramod
    Chaudhary, Debashish
    Goel, Alok
    Dora, Tapas Kumar
    Brar, Rahat
    Gulia, Ashish
    Divatia, Jigeeshu
    SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 12 (02) : 104 - 111
  • [8] Validation of the IHC4 Breast Cancer Prognostic Algorithm Using Multiple Approaches on the Multinational TEAM Clinical Trial
    Bartlett, John M. S.
    Christiansen, Jason
    Gustavson, Mark
    Rimm, David L.
    Piper, Tammy
    van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
    Hasenburg, Annette
    Kieback, Dirk G.
    Putter, Hein
    Markopoulos, Christos J.
    Dirix, Luc Y.
    Seynaeve, Caroline
    Rea, Daniel W.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 140 (01) : 66 - 74
  • [9] Ki-67 evaluation using deep-learning model-assisted digital image analysis in breast cancer
    Matsumoto, Hirofumi
    Miyata, Ryota
    Tsuruta, Yuma
    Nakada, Norihiro
    Koki, Ayako
    Unesoko, Mikiko
    Abe, Norie
    Zaha, Hisamitsu
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2025, 86 (03) : 460 - 471
  • [10] Reproducibility and Prognostic Potential of Ki-67 Proliferation Index when Comparing Digital-Image Analysis with Standard Semi-Quantitative Evaluation in Breast Cancer
    Acs, Balazs
    Madaras, Lilla
    Kovacs, Kristof Attila
    Micsik, Tamas
    Tokes, Anna-Maria
    Gyorffy, Balazs
    Kulka, Janina
    Szasz, Attila Marcell
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (01) : 115 - 127