Open Science: A New "Trust Technology"?

被引:46
作者
Grand, Ann [1 ]
Wilkinson, Clare
Bultitude, Karen [2 ]
Winfield, Alan F. T.
机构
[1] Univ W England, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Sci Commun Unit, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[2] UCL, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
public perception of scientists; public understanding of science; scientific; COMMUNICATION; SCIENTISTS; KNOWLEDGE; TALKING;
D O I
10.1177/1075547012443021
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The emerging practice of open science, which makes the entire process of a scientific investigation available, could extend membership of the research community to new, public audiences, who do not have access to science's long-established trust mechanisms. This commentary considers if the structures that enable scientists to trust each other, and the public to trust scientists, are enriched by the open science approach. The completeness of information provided by open science, whether as a replacement for or complement to older systems for establishing trust within science, makes it a potentially useful "trust technology.".
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 689
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]   Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public [J].
Davies, Sarah R. .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2008, 29 (04) :413-434
[12]  
Gieryn T. F., 1999, The cultural boundaries of science
[13]  
Harnad S., 2000, The invisible hand of peer review
[14]   The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access:: An update [J].
Harnad, Stevan ;
Brody, Tim ;
Vallieres, Francois ;
Carr, Les ;
Hitchcock, Steve ;
Gingras, Yves ;
Oppenheim, Charles ;
Hajjem, Chawki ;
Hilf, Eberhard R. .
SERIALS REVIEW, 2008, 34 (01) :36-40
[16]  
Ince D., 2011, TIMES HIGHER ED OCT
[17]  
IpsosMORI, 2011, PUBL ATT SCI 2011
[18]  
Irwin Alan., 2008, Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, P199
[19]  
Knorr Cetina Karin., 1999, Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge, DOI DOI 10.4159/9780674039681
[20]   The Rise of the Knowledge Broker [J].
Meyer, Morgan .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2010, 32 (01) :118-127