Can coproduction change the perceived outcome of rural public services? Evidence from the "New Socialist Countryside" initiative in China

被引:0
作者
Zheng, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Univ, Sch Govt, Kunming 650091, Peoples R China
来源
CHINESE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW | 2022年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
China; civic participation; Coproduction; New Socialist Countryside; the Public Services Provision; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1177/15396754221116714
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The recent research on citizen participation in the provision of public services represented by coproduction has become a hot topic in public management. Coproduction studies propose that citizens can directly or indirectly participate in the process of public services to help improve the quality and legitimacy of public services. Very little, however, has been written in the existing coproduction literature on the outcome of public services provision. Based on the "One-Hundred Villages" Survey in 2020, this article analyzes and evaluates the impact of coproduction on the perceived outcome of public service in rural China. A series of statistical analysis results show that both co-planning and co-delivery have significant and positive impacts on how one views the outcome of rural public service provision. This research provides new evidence in rural China that citizen participation plays a crucial role in the state-led "New Socialist Countryside" campaign.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 149
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Strategic Modelling: "Building a New Socialist Countryside" in Three Chinese Counties [J].
Ahlers, Anna L. ;
Schubert, Gunter .
CHINA QUARTERLY, 2013, (216) :831-849
[2]  
BOVAIRD T, 2010, REPOSITIONING EUROPE, P3
[3]  
Bovaird T, 2016, INT REV ADM SCI, V82, P47, DOI [10.3917/risa.821.0053, 10.1177/0020852314566009]
[4]   From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value [J].
Bovaird, Tony ;
Loeffler, Elke .
VOLUNTAS, 2012, 23 (04) :1119-1138
[5]   Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions [J].
Brandsen, Taco ;
Honingh, Marlies .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (03) :427-435
[6]   Evaluating the outcomes of co-production in local government [J].
Brix, Jacob ;
Krogstrup, Hanne Kathrine ;
Mortensen, Nanna Moeller .
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 2020, 46 (02) :169-185
[7]   THE EVALUATION OF COPRODUCTION PROGRAMS [J].
BRUDNEY, JL .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 1983, 12 (02) :376-385
[8]   Coproducing Responses to COVID-19 with Community-Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China [J].
Cheng, Yuan ;
Yu, Jianxing ;
Shen, Yongdong ;
Huang, Biao .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2020, 80 (05) :866-873
[9]   Coproduction and satisfaction with online schooling during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from European countries [J].
Cicatiello, Lorenzo ;
De Simone, Elina ;
D'Uva, Marcella ;
Gaeta, Giuseppe Lucio ;
Pinto, Mauro .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2023, 25 (03) :637-656
[10]   Public Goods and Regime Support in Urban China [J].
Dickson, Bruce J. ;
Landry, Pierre F. ;
Shen, Mingming ;
Yan, Jie .
CHINA QUARTERLY, 2016, 228 :859-880