Public Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics in Medicine

被引:63
作者
Stai, Bethany [1 ]
Heller, Nick [1 ]
McSweeney, Sean [2 ]
Rickman, Jack [1 ]
Blake, Paul [2 ]
Vasdev, Ranveer [2 ]
Edgerton, Zach [2 ]
Tejpaul, Resha [1 ]
Peterson, Matt [2 ]
Rosenberg, Joel [2 ]
Kalapara, Arveen [2 ]
Regmi, Subodh [2 ]
Papanikolopoulos, Nikolaos [1 ]
Weight, Christopher [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, 200 Union St SE,4-192 Keller Hall, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Urol, Minneapolis, MN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
artificial intelligence; robotic surgery; active surveillance; patient counseling; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1089/end.2020.0137
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective:To understand better the public perception and comprehension of medical technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic surgery. In addition to this, to identify sensitivity to their use to ensure acceptability and quality of counseling. Subjects and Methods:A survey was conducted on a convenience sample of visitors to the MN Minnesota State Fair (n = 264). Participants were randomized to receive one of two similar surveys. In the first, a diagnosis was made by a physician and in the second by an AI application to compare confidence in human and computer-based diagnosis. Results:The median age of participants was 45 (interquartile range 28-59), 58% were female (n = 154)vs42% male (n = 110), 69% had completed at least a bachelor's degree, 88% were Caucasian (n = 233)vs12% ethnic minorities (n = 31) and were from 12 states, mostly from the Upper Midwest. Participants had nearly equal trust in AIvsphysician diagnoses. However, they were significantly more likely to trust an AI diagnosis of cancer over a doctor's diagnosis when responding to the version of the survey that suggested that an AI could make medical diagnoses (p = 9.32e-06). Though 55% of respondents (n = 145) reported that they were uncomfortable with automated robotic surgery, the majority of the individuals surveyed (88%) mistakenly believed that partially autonomous surgery was already happening. Almost all (94%,n = 249) stated that they would be willing to pay for a review of medical imaging by an AI if available. Conclusion:Most participants express confidence in AI providing medical diagnoses, sometimes even over human physicians. Participants generally express concern with surgical AI, but they mistakenly believe that it is already being performed. As AI applications increase in medical practice, health care providers should be cognizant of the potential amount of misinformation and sensitivity that patients have to how such technology is represented.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1048
页数:8
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence [J].
Ahmad, Arif ;
Ahmad, Zoha F. ;
Carleton, Jared D. ;
Agarwala, Ashish .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (01) :255-263
[2]  
American Community Survey Office, 2017, 2017 DAT PROF
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Social and behavioural questions associated with automated vehicles: A literature review
[4]   Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them [J].
Boys, Joshua A. ;
Alicuben, Evan T. ;
DeMeester, Michael J. ;
Worrell, Stephanie G. ;
Oh, Daniel S. ;
Hagen, Jeffrey A. ;
DeMeester, Steven R. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (04) :1310-1316
[5]  
Cestari Andrea, 2013, Urologia, V80, P42, DOI 10.5301/RU.2013.10744
[6]   Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle [J].
Choi, Jong Kyu ;
Ji, Yong Gu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2015, 31 (10) :692-702
[7]  
Fast EthanEric Horvitz., 2016, LONG TERM TRENDS PUB
[8]  
Grady D., A I TOOK TEST DETECT
[9]   Artificial Intelligence in Precision Cardiovascular Medicine [J].
Krittanawong, Chayakrit ;
Zhang, HongJu ;
Wang, Zhen ;
Aydar, Mehmet ;
Kitai, Takeshi .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (21) :2657-2664
[10]  
Longoni C, 2019, RESISTANCE MED ARTIF, DOI [10.1093/jcr/ucz013/5485292, DOI 10.1093/JCR/UCZ013/5485292]