Weed management with S-metolachlor and glyphosate mixtures in glyphosate-resistant strip- and conventional-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

被引:30
作者
Clewis, SB
Wilcut, JW
Porterfield, D
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Syngenta Crop Protect, Cary, NC 27502 USA
关键词
economic returns; herbicide-resistant crops; tillage systems;
D O I
10.1614/WT-05-030R.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Five studies were conducted at Clayton, Rocky Mount, and Lewiston-Woodville, NC, in 2001 and 2002, to evaluate weed management, crop tolerance, and yield in strip- and conventional-tillage glyphosate-resistant cotton. Cotton was treated with two glyphosate formulations; glyphosate-IP (isopropylamine salt) or glyphosate-TM (trimethylsulfonium salt), early postemergence (EPOST) alone or in a mixture with S-metolachlor. Early season cotton injury was minimal (3%) with either glyphosate formulation alone or in mixture with S-metolachlor. Weed control and cotton yields were similar for both glyphosate formulations. The addition of S-metolachlor to either glyphosate formulation increased control of broadleaf signalgrass, goosegrass, large crabgrass, and yellow foxtail 14 to 43 percentage points compared with control by glyphosate alone. S-metolachlor was not beneficial for late-season control of entireleaf morningglory, jimsonweed, pitted morningglory, or yellow nutsedge. The addition of S-metolachlor to either glyphosate formulation increased control of common lambsquarters, common ragweed, Palmer amaranth, smooth pigweed, and velvetleaf 6 to 46 percentage points. The addition of a late postemergence-directed (LAYBY) treatment of prometryn plus MSMA increased control to greater than 95% for all weed species regardless of EPOST treatment, and control was similar with or without S-metolachlor EPOST. Cotton lint yield was increased 220 kg/ha with the addition of S-metolachlor to either glyphosate formulation compared with yield from glyphosate alone. The addition of the LAYBY treatment increased yields 250 and 380 kg/ha for glyphosate plus S-metolachlor and glyphosate systems, respectively. S-metolachlor residual activity allowed for an extended window for more effective LAYBY application to smaller weed seedlings instead of weeds that were possibly larger and harder to control.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 241
页数:10
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Cost and weed management with herbicide programs in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) [J].
Askew, SD ;
Wilcut, JW .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (02) :308-313
[2]  
Askew SD, 2002, WEED SCI, V50, P512, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0512:EAOWMF]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Glyphosate-resistant goosegrass. Identification of a mutation in the target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase [J].
Baerson, SR ;
Rodriguez, DJ ;
Tran, M ;
Feng, YM ;
Biest, NA ;
Dill, GM .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 129 (03) :1265-1275
[5]  
Bailey WA, 2003, WEED SCI, V51, P94, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0094:VATIAS]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
BOWMAN DT, 2002, 2002 COTTON INFORMAT, P24
[8]  
BRADLEY JF, 1995, CONSERVATION TILLAGE, P31
[9]  
BROWN AB, 2003, 761 N CAR STAT U DEP, P3
[10]   INFLUENCE OF WEED COMPETITION ON COTTON [J].
BUCHANAN, GA ;
BURNS, ER .
WEED SCIENCE, 1970, 18 (01) :149-&