Check-in/Check-out Implementation in Schools: a Meta-Analysis of Group Design Studies

被引:8
作者
Park, Eun-Young [1 ]
Blair, Kwang-Sun Cho [2 ]
机构
[1] Jeonju Univ, Dept Secondary Special Educ, Coll Educ, 303 Cheonjam Ro, Jeonbuk 55069, South Korea
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Child & Family Studies, Coll Behav & Community Sci, 13301 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
Check-in; check-out; Behavior education program; Tier; 2; Group design; Meta-analysis; POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT; TIER; 2; INTERVENTIONS; GROUP CONTINGENCY INTERVENTIONS; AT-RISK; ELEMENTARY; STUDENTS; FIDELITY; PROGRAM; STEP;
D O I
10.1007/s43494-020-00030-2
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
This meta-analysis study synthesized the intervention effects of Check-in/Check-out (CICO), the most common Tier 2 behavior intervention used in schools. Systematic review procedures were employed to examine six CICO studies that were evaluated using a group research design and that involved 146 students. Studies were coded to examine their characteristics as well as quality indicators concerning their design features. The results indicated that in group design studies, the overall effect size of CICO across student outcomes (problem behavior, appropriate behavior, social skills, and academic performance) was medium (g = 0.42). No differences in effects were found for outcome domains, Tier 1 fidelity, and implementation fidelity, but grade level was associated with statistically significant differences in effect sizes (Q = 3.95,p < .05). Elementary school students (g = 0.70) showed greater improvements than middle school students (g = 0.27). Further research is needed to examine the intervention features impacting the effects of CICO.
引用
收藏
页码:361 / 375
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Algozzine R.F., 2019, SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
  • [2] OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS
    BEGG, CB
    MAZUMDAR, M
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) : 1088 - 1101
  • [3] Borenstein JT, 2013, MICRO NANO TECHNOL, P3
  • [4] Borenstein M., 2009, Introduction to meta-analysis, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470743386
  • [5] Promoting Positive Behavior Using the Good Behavior Game: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research
    Bowman-Perrott, Lisa
    Burke, Mack D.
    Zaini, Samar
    Zhang, Nan
    Vannest, Kimberly
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 18 (03) : 180 - 190
  • [6] Breaks are Better: A Tier II Social Behavior Intervention
    Justin Boyd R.
    Anderson C.M.
    [J]. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2013, 22 (4) : 348 - 365
  • [7] Effects of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on Child Behavior Problems
    Bradshaw, Catherine P.
    Waasdorp, Tracy E.
    Leaf, Philip J.
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2012, 130 (05) : E1136 - E1145
  • [8] A Step-By-Step Guide to Tier 2 Behavioral Progress Monitoring
    Bruhn, Allison L.
    McDaniel, Sara C.
    Rila, Ashley
    Estrapala, Sara
    [J]. BEYOND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 27 (01) : 15 - 27
  • [9] Bruhn Allison L, 2017, Rep Emot Behav Disord Youth, V17, P64
  • [10] A Review of Tier 2 Interventions Conducted Within Multitiered Models of Behavioral Prevention
    Bruhn, Allison Leigh
    Lane, Kathleen Lynne
    Hirsch, Shanna Eisner
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2014, 22 (03) : 171 - 189