The identification of adverse events in hip fracture patients using the Global Trigger Tool: A prospective observational cohort study

被引:5
|
作者
Pettersson, Paula Kelly [1 ,2 ]
Skoldenberg, Olof [1 ,2 ]
Samuelsson, Bodil [2 ,3 ]
Stark, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
Muren, Olav [1 ,2 ]
Unbeck, Maria [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Danderyd Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Danderyd Hosp, Dept Clin Sci, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Acute & Reparat Med Theme, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Adverse event; Hip fracture; Retrospective record review; Global Trigger Tool; RISK-FACTORS; MORTALITY; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY; TIME; HOSPITALIZATION; TRENDS; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijotn.2020.100779
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction: Hip fracture is common in the elderly and is associated with high comorbidity, mortality and complication rates. There has been an increase in the investigation of healthcare-related adverse events (AEs) in some patient groups but there is limited knowledge about hip fracture patients. The aim was to explore the incidence, preventability and nature of AEs in hip fracture patients. Methods: One hundred and sixty three hip fracture patients participated. A record review was conducted of prospectively collected data using Global Trigger Tool methodology to identify AEs up to 90 days after surgery. Results: Sixty two (38.0%) of 163 patients had at least one AE (range 1-7). One hundred and two AEs were identified and 62 (60.8%) were deemed preventable. Healthcare-associated infections e.g. pneumonia, urinary tract infections and pressure ulcers were common. AEs were more common in older patients and those with pre-existing health conditions. Fifty eight (56.9%) AEs caused temporary harm and 4 (3.9%) contributed to patient death. Conclusion: AEs are common in hip fracture patients and most are preventable. If the focus is on improving healthcare for these patients, we should be concentrating our efforts on reducing the number of these preventable AEs, with a particular emphasis on improving the care of older patients with pre-existing health conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Performance of IHI Global Trigger Tool in Identification of Adverse Drug Events: A Prospective Observational Study
    Goruntla, Narayana
    Nitturi, Krishna Yasaswini
    Pujari, Krishnapriya
    Jayanthi, Lavanya
    Gurram, Venkata Ramana
    Veerabhadrappa, Kasturi Vishwanathasetty
    Bhupalam, Pradeepkumar
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 33 (31A) : 146 - 156
  • [2] Assessment of a Geriatric Hip Fracture Program Analysis of Harmful Adverse Events Using the Global Trigger Tool
    Blood, Travis D.
    Deren, Matthew E.
    Goodman, Avi D.
    Hayda, Roman A.
    Trafton, Peter G.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (08): : 704 - 709
  • [3] Timing of adverse events in patients undergoing acute and elective hip arthroplasty surgery: a multicentre cohort study using the Global Trigger Tool
    Magneli, Martin
    Kelly-Pettersson, Paula
    Rogmark, Cecilia
    Gordon, Max
    Skoldenberg, Olof
    Unbeck, Maria
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [4] Evaluation of accuracy of IHI Trigger Tool in identifying adverse drug events: a prospective observational study
    Graciano Silva, Maria das Dores
    Parreiras Martins, Maria Auxiliadora
    Viana, Luciana de Gouvea
    Passaglia, Luiz Guilherme
    de Menezes, Renata Rezende
    de Queiroz Oliveira, Joao Antonio
    Padilha da Silva, Jose Luiz
    Pinho Ribeiro, Antonio Luiz
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 84 (10) : 2252 - 2259
  • [5] Identifying adverse events in hospitalized patients using global trigger tool in Thailand
    Asavaroengchai, Santawat
    Sriratanaban, Jiruth
    Hiransuthikul, Narin
    Supachutikul, Anuwat
    ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2009, 3 (05) : 545 - 550
  • [6] Is a modified Global Trigger Tool method using automatic trigger identification valid when measuring adverse events?
    Mevik, Kjersti
    Hansen, Tonje E.
    Deilkas, Ellen C.
    Ringdal, Alexander M.
    Vonen, Barthold
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2019, 31 (07) : 535 - 540
  • [7] Describing adverse events in Swiss hospitalized oncology patients using the Global Trigger Tool
    Gerber, Anne
    Da Silva Lopes, Andre
    Szuets, Natacha
    Simon, Michael
    Ribordy-Baudat, Viviane
    Ebneter, Andreas
    Perrinjaquet, Claire
    Gaignard, Marie-Estelle
    Nicodet, Delphine
    Betticher, Daniel
    Bula, Gregoire
    Cote, Maxime
    Duchosal, Michel Andre
    Berret, Pierre-Andre
    Dietrich, Pierre-Yves
    Brennan, Caitlin
    Decosterd, Sandy
    Nobre, Sandrina Ferreira
    Peters, Solange
    Koelliker, Reto
    Ninane, Francoise
    Jeitziner, Marie-Madlen
    Colomer-Lahiguera, Sara
    Eicher, Manuela
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2020, 3 (02)
  • [8] Detection of adverse events in hospitalized adult patients by using the Global Trigger Tool method
    Guzman-Ruiz, O.
    Ruiz-Lopez, P.
    Gomez-Camara, A.
    Ramirez-Martin, M.
    REVISTA DE CALIDAD ASISTENCIAL, 2015, 30 (04) : 166 - 174
  • [9] Detection of adverse events in patients interned in medical clinic using the Global Trigger Tool
    Dotta, Agustina T.
    Sotelo, Leonora E. Duarte
    Biaggioni, Marttin A.
    Martin, Sofia, V
    De Tapia, Julieta B.
    Encina, Romina
    Sole, Juan A. Castiglia
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2024, 84 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [10] Describing adverse events in medical inpatients using the Global Trigger Tool
    Nicole, Grossmann
    Franziska, Gratwohl
    Sarah, Musy N.
    Natascha, Nielen M.
    Jacques, Donze
    Michael, Simon
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2019, 149