Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Robotic and Conventional Approaches in Patients with Pre- and Poststyloid Parapharyngeal Space Tumors

被引:19
作者
Lim, Jae-Yol [1 ]
Park, Young Min [1 ]
Kang, Min Seok [1 ]
Kim, Da Hee [1 ]
Choi, Eun Chang [1 ]
Kim, Se-Heon [1 ]
Koh, Yoon Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
CASE SERIES; SURGERY; RESECTION; EXPERIENCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-020-08536-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Benefits and drawbacks of robotic surgical approaches for parapharyngeal space (PPS) tumors remain undetermined. The purpose of this study is to compare surgical outcomes of PPS tumor patients who underwent robotic surgery with those of patients who received conventional surgical treatment. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathologic data from 136 patients who underwent surgical removal of PPS tumors via conventional or robotic approaches. Results We identified PPS tumors in pre- and poststyloid regions in 87 (64%) and 49 (36%) patients, respectively. There were 48 (35.3%) pleomorphic adenomas, 36 (26.5%) schwannomas, and 24 (17.6%) paragangliomas. Conventional surgical techniques were performed in 83 patients, and robotic surgical approaches were administered to 53 patients. Transcervical-parotid and transcervical approaches were most commonly performed in conventional surgery, while transoral and retroauricular approaches were the preferred surgical methods in robotic surgery for pre- and poststyloid PPS tumors, respectively. Robotic surgery resulted in less estimated blood loss during poststyloid PPS tumor surgery. Postoperative cranial nerve complications were noted in 36 of 83 cases (43.4%) in the conventional surgery group and in 17 of 53 cases (32.1%) in the robotic surgery group. Intraoperative tumor spillage of pleomorphic adenoma showed no significant differences between the two groups (13.6% in conventional vs. 15.4% in robotic surgery). The mean follow-up time was 4.9 +/- 3.4 years, and recurrences were observed in two patients during follow-up without a significant difference between the two groups (4.5% in conventional vs. 3.8% in robotic surgery). Conclusions Robotic surgery in PPS tumors is feasible through transoral, retroauricular, or combined approaches and provides treatment outcomes comparable to those of conventional open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:4535 / 4543
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Transoral Robotic Surgery in Retrostyloid Parapharyngeal Space Schwannomas
    Ansarin, Mohssen
    Tagliabue, Marta
    Chu, Francesco
    Zorzi, Stefano
    Proh, Michele
    Preda, Lorenzo
    [J]. CASE REPORTS IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 2014
  • [2] Transoral robotic resection of selected parapharyngeal space tumors
    Arshad, Hassan
    Durmus, Kasim
    Ozer, Enver
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 270 (05) : 1737 - 1740
  • [3] Transoral robotic approach to parapharyngeal space tumors: Case series and technical limitations
    Boyce, Brian J.
    Curry, Joseph M.
    Luginbuhl, Adam
    Cognetti, David M.
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2016, 126 (08) : 1776 - 1782
  • [4] The New Era of Robotic Neck Surgery: The Universal Application of the Retroauricular Approach
    Byeon, Hyung Kwon
    Koh, Yoon Woo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 112 (07) : 707 - 716
  • [5] Transoral robotic resection of benign tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract: Experience of the French group of GETTEC
    Chabrillac, Emilien
    Moriniere, Sylvain
    Jegoux, Franck
    Blanchard, David
    Choussy, Olivier
    Hans, Stephane
    Vergez, Sebastien
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2018, 40 (09): : 2043 - 2049
  • [6] Transoral robotic surgery of the parapharyngeal space: A case series and systematic review
    Chan, Jason Y. K.
    Tsang, Raymond K.
    Eisele, David W.
    Richmon, Jeremy D.
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2015, 37 (02): : 293 - 298
  • [7] From transmandibular to transoral robotic approach for parapharyngeal space tumors
    Chu, Francesco
    Tagliabue, Marta
    Giugliano, Gioacchino
    Calabrese, Luca
    Preda, Lorenzo
    Ansarin, Mohssen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 38 (04) : 375 - 379
  • [8] Transoral robotic surgery for the resection of parapharyngeal tumour: Our experience in ten patients
    De Virgilio, A.
    Park, Y. M.
    Kim, W. S.
    Byeon, H. K.
    Lee, S. Y.
    Kim, S-H
    [J]. CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2012, 37 (06) : 483 - 488
  • [9] Combined endoscopic transcervical-transoral robotic approach for resection of parapharyngeal space tumors
    Duek, Irit
    Amit, Moran
    Sviri, Gill E.
    Gil, Ziv
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2017, 39 (04): : 786 - 790
  • [10] The Transcervical Approach for Parapharyngeal Space Pleomorphic Adenomas: Indications and Technique
    Horowitz, Gilad
    Ben-Ari, Oded
    Wasserzug, Oshri
    Weizman, Noam
    Yehuda, Moshe
    Fliss, Dan M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):