The Political Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Research Agenda

被引:146
作者
Whelan, Glen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Int Ctr Corporate Social Responsibil, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
corporate governance; globalization; Habermas; multinational corporations; Rawls; political corporate social responsibility; HUMAN-RIGHTS; BUSINESS; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; JUSTICE; ACCOUNTABILITY; CITIZENSHIP; RAWLS; JOHN; CONCEPTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.5840/beq201222445
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
I here advance a critical research agenda for the political perspective of corporate social responsibility (Political CSR). I argue that whilst the 'Political' CSR literature is notable for both its conceptual novelty and practical importance, its development has been hamstrung by four ambiguities, conflations and/or oversights. More positively, I argue that 'Political' CSR should be conceived as one potential form of globalization, and not as a consequence of 'globalization'; that contemporary Western MNCs should be presumed to engage in CSR for instrumental reasons; that 'Political' CSR should be associated with a corresponding 'political' model of corporate governance; and that both a 'Rawlsian' and 'Habermasian' perspective of Political CSR are different from 'Political' CSR. In concluding, I use these four critiques to identify a number of areas within which increasingly robust and sophisticated positive and normative theories of Political CSR are required.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 737
页数:29
相关论文
共 114 条
[11]   Human rights, global justice, and disaggregated states: John Rawls, Onora O'Neill, and Anne-Marie Slaughter [J].
Bernstein, Alyssa R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIOLOGY, 2007, 66 (01) :87-111
[12]  
Blanchfield L., 2011, 75700 CRS, P7
[13]  
Blowfield Michael., 2005, INT RELATIONS, V19, P173, DOI DOI 10.1177/0047117805052812
[14]  
Boatright JR, 2006, J PRIV ENTERP, V22, P106
[15]   INTERNATIONAL-BUSINESS POLITICAL-BEHAVIOR - NEW THEORETICAL DIRECTIONS [J].
BODDEWYN, JJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1994, 19 (01) :119-143
[16]  
Bonardi JP, 2005, ACAD MANAGE REV, V30, P397, DOI [10.2307/20159126, 10.5465/AMR.2005.16387895]
[17]  
Bowie N.E., 1999, BUSINESS ETHICS KANT
[18]  
Bull Hedley., 1995, ANARCHICAL SOC STUDY, V2nd
[19]  
Bull Hedley., 1984, EXPANSION INT SOC
[20]  
Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights (BLIHR), 2008, STAT SUPP RUGG PROT