The Political Perspective of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Critical Research Agenda

被引:146
作者
Whelan, Glen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Int Ctr Corporate Social Responsibil, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
corporate governance; globalization; Habermas; multinational corporations; Rawls; political corporate social responsibility; HUMAN-RIGHTS; BUSINESS; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; JUSTICE; ACCOUNTABILITY; CITIZENSHIP; RAWLS; JOHN; CONCEPTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.5840/beq201222445
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
I here advance a critical research agenda for the political perspective of corporate social responsibility (Political CSR). I argue that whilst the 'Political' CSR literature is notable for both its conceptual novelty and practical importance, its development has been hamstrung by four ambiguities, conflations and/or oversights. More positively, I argue that 'Political' CSR should be conceived as one potential form of globalization, and not as a consequence of 'globalization'; that contemporary Western MNCs should be presumed to engage in CSR for instrumental reasons; that 'Political' CSR should be associated with a corresponding 'political' model of corporate governance; and that both a 'Rawlsian' and 'Habermasian' perspective of Political CSR are different from 'Political' CSR. In concluding, I use these four critiques to identify a number of areas within which increasingly robust and sophisticated positive and normative theories of Political CSR are required.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 737
页数:29
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]   Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Williams, Cynthia A. ;
Ganapathi, Jyoti .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863
[2]  
Amazon Web Services, 2010, AM WEB SERV BLOG
[3]  
Amnesty International, 2010, AMN NEWS 0113
[4]   Decent democratic centralism [J].
Angle, SC .
POLITICAL THEORY, 2005, 33 (04) :518-546
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, UN C TRAD DEV NEW YO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1989, CONSTRUCTIONS REASON
[7]  
[Anonymous], SHARHOLDER VALUE MYT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1986, WEALTH NATIONS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Institutional patterns and culture
[10]   FOR WHOM CORPORATE MANAGERS ARE TRUSTEES: A NOTE [J].
Berle, A. A., Jr. .
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1932, 45 (08) :1365-1372