A comparison of intercell metrics on discrete global grid systems

被引:22
作者
Gregory, Matthew J. [1 ]
Kimerling, A. Jon [2 ]
White, Denis [3 ]
Sahr, Kevin [4 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Dept Forest Sci, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Geog, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] US EPA, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[4] So Oregon Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Ashland, OR 97520 USA
关键词
discrete global grid system; intercell distance; cell wall midpoint; goodchild criteria; distortion analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2007.11.003
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A discrete global grid system (DGGS) is a spatial data model that aids in global research by serving as a framework for environmental modeling, monitoring and sampling across the earth at multiple spatial scales. Topological and geometric criteria have been proposed to evaluate and compare DGGSs; two of which, intercell distance and the "cell wall midpoint" criterion, form the basis of this study. We propose evaluation metrics for these two criteria and present numerical results from these measures for several DGGSs. We also consider the impact of different design choices on these metrics, such as predominant tessellating shape, base modeling solid and partition density between recursive subdivisions. For the intercell distance metric, the Fuller-Gray DGGS performs best, while the Equal Angle DGGS performs substantially worse. For the cell wall midpoint metric, however, the Equal Angle DGGS has the lowest overall distortion with the Snyder and Fuller-Gray DGGSs also performing relatively well. Aggregation of triangles into hexagons has little impact on intercell distance measurements, although dual hexagon aggregation results in markedly different statistics and spatial patterns for the cell wall midpoint property. In all cases, partitions on the icosahedron outperform similar partitions on the octahedron. Partition density accounts for little variation. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:188 / 203
页数:16
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CARTOGR GEOGR INF SC
[2]  
[Anonymous], DISCRETE GLOBAL GRID
[3]  
Dutton Geoffrey., 1984, CARTOGRAPHICA INT J, V21, P188, DOI [10.3138/R613-191U-7255-082N, DOI 10.3138/R613-191U-7255-082N]
[4]  
Dutton GH, 1991, P AUTOCARTO, V10, P77
[5]  
FEKETE G, 1990, SPIE EXTRACTING MEAN, V1259, P242, DOI DOI 10.1117/12.19991
[6]  
Fuller R. B., 1982, SYNERGETICS
[7]  
Goodchild M., 1994, P GIS LIS 94 C PHOEN
[8]   A HIERARCHICAL SPATIAL DATA STRUCTURE FOR GLOBAL GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS [J].
GOODCHILD, MF ;
YANG, SR .
CVGIP-GRAPHICAL MODELS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, 1992, 54 (01) :31-44
[9]  
GRAY RW, 1995, CARTOGRAPHICA, V32, P17, DOI [DOI 10.3138/1677-3273-Q862-1885, 10 . 3138 / 1677 - 3273 - Q862 -1885]
[10]  
HEIKES R, 1995, MON WEATHER REV, V123, P1881, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<1881:NIOTSW>2.0.CO