Assessment of olfactory function after traumatic brain injury: comparison of single odour tool with detailed assessment tool

被引:4
作者
Humphries, Thomas [1 ]
Singh, Rajiv [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Med, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Sheffield Teaching Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Osborn Neurorehabil Unit, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, EMRiS, Hlth Serv Res, Sch Hlth & Related Res ScHARR, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
TBI; anosmia; assessment; depression; CT scan; olfaction; OF-PENNSYLVANIA SMELL; HEAD-INJURY; IDENTIFICATION; DISCRIMINATION; DYSFUNCTION; IMPAIRMENT; TASTE; COMMUNICATION; PERFORMANCE; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1080/02699052.2018.1434237
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objectives: Olfactory disturbance (OD) is common after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Screening for OD can be performed by several different methods. While odour identification tools are considered more accurate, they are time consuming. The predominant method in clinical practice remains the use of a single odour. This study aimed to compare a brief single-odour identification tool (BSOIT) with a more detailed 12-odour assessment tool.Materials/Methods: One hundred seventy consecutive patients with TBI had their olfaction assessed using BSOIT and a 12-item tool at a single time point. The sensitivity and specificity of the BSOIT were calculated.Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the BSOIT as compared to the Burghart tool were 57.5% and 100%, respectively, for all ODs (anosmia and hyposmia). The sensitivity and specificity for anosmia only were 93.5% and 96.7%, respectively. For the two tools, the Cohen's kappa coefficient showed moderate agreement when both anosmia and hyposmia were considered (k=0.619, p<0.001) but a very strong agreement when only anosmia was considered (k=0.844, p<0.001).For both the tools, anosmia had a significant association with TBI severity (p<0.001). However, hyposmia showed no such association.Conclusions: The BSOIT is very effective at identifying anosmia but not hyposmia, producing comparable results to a more detailed test. It can be effective in clinical practice and takes considerably less time.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 562
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Altman D G., 1990, Practical Statistics for Medical Research, DOI [DOI 10.1201/9780429258589, 10.1201/9780429258589]
  • [2] Differences in perception of everyday odors: a Japanese-German cross-cultural study
    Ayabe-Kanamura, S
    Schicker, I
    Laska, M
    Hudson, R
    Distel, H
    Kobayakawa, T
    Saito, S
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 1998, 23 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [3] Systematic bias in outcome studies of persons with traumatic brain injury
    Corrigan, JD
    Bogner, JA
    Mysiw, WJ
    Clinchot, D
    Fugate, L
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (02): : 132 - 137
  • [4] Costanzo R.M., 1992, J Head Trauma Rehabil, V7, P15, DOI DOI 10.1097/00001199-199203000-00005
  • [5] Does the presence of posttraumatic anosmia mean that you will be disinhibited?
    Crowe, Simon F.
    Crowe, Louise M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 35 (03) : 298 - 308
  • [6] Olfaction as a marker for depression in humans
    Croy, Ilona
    Symmank, Anja
    Schellong, Julia
    Hummel, Cornelia
    Gerber, Johannes
    Joraschky, Peter
    Hummel, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2014, 160 : 80 - 86
  • [7] Olfactory Disorders and Quality of Life-An Updated Review
    Croy, Ilona
    Nordin, Steven
    Hummel, Thomas
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 2014, 39 (03) : 185 - 194
  • [8] Daroff R.B., 2015, Bradley's Neurology in Clinical Practice
  • [9] Olfactory function after mild traumatic brain injury
    de Kruijk, JR
    Leffers, P
    Menheere, PPCA
    Meerhoff, S
    Rutten, J
    Twijnstra, A
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2003, 17 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [10] DEEMS DA, 1991, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V117, P519