Performance of a flat-panel detector in detecting artificial bone lesions: Comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography

被引:30
作者
Ludwig, K
Lenzen, H
Kamm, KF
Link, TM
Diederich, S
Wormanns, D
Heindel, W
机构
[1] Univ Munster, Dept Clin Radiol, D-48129 Munster, Germany
[2] Philips Med Syst, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
bones; radiography; digital; flat panel;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2222010276
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To compare a large-area direct-readout flat-panel detector system with a conventional screen-film system and a storage-phosphor system in detecting small artificial osseous lesions simulating osteolytic disease and to assess diagnostic performance with decreasing exposure dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artificial lesions (0.5-3.0 mm) were created in 100 of 200 predefined regions in 20 porcine femoral specimens. Specimens were enclosed in containers filled with water to create absorption and scatter radiation conditions comparable with those in a human extremity. Imaging was performed with a flat-panel detector system, a conventional screen-film system, and a storage-phosphor system. Levels of exposure equivalent to speed classes 400, 800, 1600, and 3200 were used. In all images, the presence or absence of a lesion was assessed by three radiologists using a five-point confidence scale. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed for 4,800 observations (600 for each imaging modality and exposure level) and diagnostic performance estimated with the area under the ROC curve (A(z)). The significance of differences in diagnostic performance was tested with analysis of variance. RESULTS: ROC analysis showed A(z) values of 0.820 (speed class 400), 0.780 (class 800), 0.758 (class 1600), and 0.676 (class 3200) for the flat-panel detector; 0.761 (class 400), 0.725 (class 800), and 0.662 (class 1600) for the storage-phosphor system; and 0.788 (class 400) for the conventional screen-film system. The A(z) value for the flat-panel detector at speed class 400 was significantly higher than that for all other systems (P < .05). A(z) values for the speed class 400 screen-film system and flat-panel detector system at speed class 800 were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The flat-panel detector has diagnostic performance superior to that of conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography for detecting small artificial osseous lesions at clinical exposure settings. With the flat-panel detector, exposure dose can be reduced by 50% to obtain diagnostic performance comparable with that of a conventional speed class 400 screen-film system.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 459
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845
  • [2] Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging:: Diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study
    Garmer, M
    Hennigs, SP
    Jäger, HJ
    Schrick, F
    van de Loo, T
    Jacobs, A
    Hanusch, A
    Christmann, A
    Mathias, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [3] ARTIFICIAL BONE EROSIONS - DETECTION WITH MAGNIFICATION RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL HIGH-RESOLUTION RADIOGRAPHY
    LINK, TM
    RUMMENY, EJ
    LENZEN, H
    REUTER, I
    ROOS, N
    PETERS, PE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (03) : 861 - 864
  • [4] Selenium-based digital radiography in the detection of bone lesions: Preliminary experience with experimentally created defects
    Ludwig, K
    Link, TM
    Fiebich, M
    Renger, B
    Diederich, S
    Oelerich, M
    Lenzen, H
    Heindel, W
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (01) : 220 - 224
  • [5] BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ROC ANALYSIS
    METZ, CE
    [J]. SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1978, 8 (04) : 283 - 298
  • [6] NEITZEL U, 2000, MED IMAGING 2000 IMA
  • [7] Digital radiography with a large-area, amorphous-silicon, flat-panel X-ray detector system
    Spahn, M
    Strotzer, M
    Völk, M
    Böhm, S
    Geiger, B
    Hahm, G
    Feuerbach, S
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (04) : 260 - 266
  • [8] Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom:: Detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector
    Strotzer, M
    Völk, M
    Wild, T
    von Landenberg, P
    Feuerbach, S
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) : 512 - 515
  • [9] Clinical application of a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon technology:: Image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction in skeletal radiography
    Strotzer, M
    Gmeinwieser, J
    Völk, M
    Fründ, R
    Seitz, J
    Manke, C
    Albrich, H
    Feuerbach, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [10] Detection of simulated chest lesions with normal and reduced radiation dose -: Comparison of conventional screen-film radiography and a flat-panel x-ray detector based on amorphous silicon
    Strotzer, M
    Gmeinwieser, JK
    Völk, M
    Fründ, R
    Seitz, J
    Feuerbach, S
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1998, 33 (02) : 98 - 103