Beyond static assessment of children's receptive vocabulary: the dynamic assessment of word learning (DAWL)

被引:29
作者
Camilleri, Bernard [1 ]
Botting, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ London, Div Language & Commun Sci, London EC1V 0HB, England
关键词
vocabulary; dynamic assessment; language; referred;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.12033
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Children's low scores on vocabulary tests are often erroneously interpreted as reflecting poor cognitive and/or language skills. It may be necessary to incorporate the measurement of word-learning ability in estimating children's lexical abilities. Aims: To explore the reliability and validity of the Dynamic Assessment of Word Learning (DAWL), a new dynamic assessment of receptive vocabulary. Methods & Procedures: A dynamic assessment (DA) of word learning ability was developed and adopted within a nursery school setting with 15 children aged between 3; 07 and 4; 03, ten of whom had been referred to speech and language therapy. Outcomes & Results: A number of quantitative measures were derived from the DA procedure, including measures of children's ability to identify the targeted items and to generalize to a second exemplar, as well as measures of children's ability to retain the targeted items. Internal, inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the DAWL was established as well as correlational measures of concurrent and predictive validity. Conclusions & Implications: The DAWL was found to provide both quantitative and qualitative information which could be used to improve the accuracy of differential diagnosis and the understanding of processes underlying the child's performance. The latter can be used for the purpose of designing more individualized interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 581
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alony S., 2007, ADV SPEECH LANGUAGE, V9, P323, DOI 10. 1080/14417040701291415
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, ADM SCORING MANUAL
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1985, Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives
  • [4] Bain B.A., 1995, American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, V4, P81, DOI DOI 10.1044/1058-0360.0401.81
  • [5] Bishop D.V. M., 1997, UNCOMMON UNDERSTANDI
  • [6] Bloom L., 2000, BECOMING WORD LEARNE, P19, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195130324.003.002
  • [7] LINGUISTIC DETERMINISM AND THE PART OF SPEECH
    BROWN, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1957, 55 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [8] Camilleri B., 2007, Advances in Speech-Language Pathology, V9, P312, DOI [DOI 10.1080/14417040701624474, https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040701624474]
  • [9] Campione J.C., 1987, Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential, P82, DOI DOI 10.1002/1520-6807(198810)25:4<439::AID-PITS2310250414<3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-3