Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in renal transplant recipients with gastrointestinal tract disorders

被引:39
作者
Darji, P. [1 ]
Vijayaraghavan, R.
Thiagarajan, C. M. [3 ]
Sharma, R. K. [7 ]
Subbarao, B. [4 ,12 ]
Pishardy, R. [8 ]
Dakshinamurthy, K. V. [9 ]
Vijaykumar, R. [2 ,5 ]
Abraham, G. [6 ]
Bhaskar, S. [6 ]
Agarwal, L. [11 ]
Shah, B.
Abraham, A. [13 ]
John, M. [14 ]
Sampathkumar, K. [15 ]
Das, T. [16 ]
Umesh, L. [17 ]
Sundar, S. [18 ,21 ]
Ballal, H. [19 ]
Jasuja, S. [20 ]
Saxena, S.
Saha, T. K. [10 ]
机构
[1] Gujarat Kidney Fdn, Ahmadabad 380007, Gujarat, India
[2] So Railway Hosp, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Devaki Hosp Ltd, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Apollo Hosp, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[5] Chennai Kaliappa Hosp, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Madras Med Mission, Madras, Tamil Nadu, India
[7] Sanjay Gandhi Postgrad Inst Med Sci, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[8] Med Coll Hosp Trivandrum, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
[9] Nizams Inst Med Sci, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[10] Kamineni Hosp, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India
[11] Woodlands Med Ctr Ltd, Kolkata, W Bengal, India
[12] Lilavati Hosp, Bombay, Maharashtra, India
[13] Lakeshore Hosp, Cochin, Kerala, India
[14] Med Trust Hosp, Cochin, Kerala, India
[15] Madurai Meenakshi Mission Hosp, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India
[16] Int Hosp, Guwwahati, India
[17] MS Ramaiah Mem Hosp, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[18] Karnataka Nephrol & Transplant Inst, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[19] Manipal Hosp, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
[20] Indraprastha Apollo Hosp, Delhi, India
[21] Pushpavati Singhania Hosp, Delhi, India
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.07.041
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Objective. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the effect of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to enteric-coated mycophenotate sodium (EC-MPS) in renal transplant recipients with gastrointestinal tract (GI) reverse effects using patient-reported outcomes instrument. Methods. A multicenter, open-label, prospective study was undertaken in renal transplant recipients treated with NIME In patients experiencing GI tract symptoms, treatment was changed to equimolar EC-MPS (myfortic). At baseline and visit 2 (4-6 weeks after baseline), patients completed the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), and physicians completed the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE) scale at visit 2. A difference of 0.5 or greater in the OTE score is indicative of clinical relevance. Results. Of 154 patients screened, 118 fulfilled the inclusion or exclusion criteria. Eighty-five men and 33 women with a mean age of 41.6 years participated in this study. Median time since transplantation was 12 months. Mean (SD) dose of MMF reported at baseline was 1209.4 (422.89) mg/d. More than 50% of patients reported MMF-associated nausea, dyspepsia, and abdominal pain. After conversion to an equimolar dose of EC-MPS, patients showed improvement in GI symptoms. This benefit was predominantly observed in patients with moderate to severe symptoms at baseline. On the GSRS, patients reported a significant (P < .05) reduction in symptom burden across all parameters (reflux, 36%; diarrhea, 38%; indigestion, 36%; constipation, 28%; and abdominal pain, 40%). On the GIQLI also, significant (P < .05) improvement was reported (symptoms, 18%; emotional status, 22%; physical functioning, 21%, and use of medical treatment, 18%). On the OTE scale, 84.7% of patients reported improvement in GI symptoms. Conclusion. Inpatients with moderate to severe GI symptoms, changing treatment from MMF to EC-MPS significantly reduces GI-related symptom burden and improves GI-specific quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:2262 / 2267
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Boswell Anita, 2006, Prog Transplant, V16, P138
[2]   Review of the immunosuppressant enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium [J].
Budde, K ;
Glander, P ;
Diekmann, F ;
Waiser, J ;
Fritsche, L ;
Dragun, D ;
Neumayer, HH .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 5 (06) :1333-1345
[3]   Patient-reported gastrointestinal symptom burden and health-related quality of life following conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium [J].
Chan, Laurence ;
Mulgaonkar, Shamkant ;
Walker, Rowan ;
Arns, Wolfgang ;
Ambuehl, Patrice ;
Schlavelli, Ruben .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 81 (09) :1290-1297
[4]   WELL-BEING AND GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS AMONG PATIENTS REFERRED TO ENDOSCOPY OWING TO SUSPECTED DUODENAL-ULCER [J].
DIMENAS, E ;
GLISE, H ;
HALLERBACK, B ;
HERNQVIST, H ;
SVEDLUND, J ;
WIKLUND, I .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 30 (11) :1046-1052
[5]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS - AN IMPROVED EVALUATION OF TREATMENT REGIMENS [J].
DIMENAS, E ;
GLISE, H ;
HALLERBACK, B ;
HERNQVIST, H ;
SVEDLUND, J ;
WIKLUND, I .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 28 (08) :681-687
[6]   GASTROINTESTINAL QUALITY-OF-LIFE INDEX - DEVELOPMENT, VALIDATION AND APPLICATION OF A NEW INSTRUMENT [J].
EYPASCH, E ;
WILLIAMS, JI ;
WOODDAUPHINEE, S ;
URE, BM ;
SCHMULLING, C ;
NEUGEBAUER, E ;
TROIDL, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (02) :216-222
[7]   Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials [J].
Guyatt, GH ;
Juniper, EF ;
Walter, SD ;
Griffith, LE ;
Goldstein, RS .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7132) :690-693
[8]   MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
SINGER, J ;
GUYATT, GH .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04) :407-415
[9]   DETERMINING A MINIMAL IMPORTANT CHANGE IN A DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
JUNIPER, EF ;
GUYATT, GH ;
WILLAN, A ;
GRIFFITH, LE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (01) :81-87
[10]   Questionnaire-based evaluation of gastrointestinal disorders in de novo renal-transplant patients receiving either mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium [J].
Kamar, N ;
Oufroukhi, L ;
Faure, P ;
Ribes, D ;
Cointault, O ;
Lavayssiere, L ;
Nogier, MB ;
Esposito, L ;
Durand, D ;
Rostaing, L .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 (10) :2231-2236