On the etiology of conflict cultures

被引:37
作者
Gelfand, Michele J. [1 ]
Leslie, Lisa M. [2 ]
Keller, Kirsten A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Psychol, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Carlson Sch Management, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
来源
RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 28: AN ANNUAL SERIES OF ANALYTICAL ESSAYS AND CRITICAL REVIEWS | 2008年 / 28卷
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Conflict has long, been conceived as a fundamental part of all organizational systems. Yet the literature on conflict is largely divorced from its organizational roots and instead focuses on general processes of conflict management at the individual and small group levels of analysis. To re-establish the organizational basis of conflict, we develop a macro-theory of conflict cultures, or shared norms that specify how conflict should be managed in organizational settings. We propose it typology of conflict Cultures that draws upon two dimensions - active versus passive conflict management norms and agreeable versus disagreeable conflict management norms - and discuss the etiology of four distinct conflict cultures: dominating conflict cultures (active and disagreeable). collaborative conflict cultures (active and agreeable), avoidant conflict cultures (passive and agreeable), and passive-aggressive conflict cultures (passive and disagreeable). We discuss top-down processes (e.g., leadership, organizational structure and rewards, industry, community, and societal factors) and bottom-up processes (e.g., personality, demographics, values and social networks) through which these conflict Cultures develop. We explore both positive and negative organizational outcomes associated with each conflict culture, as well as moderators of proposed effects. We conclude with theoretical, practical, and empirical implications of a conflict Culture perspective. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 166
页数:30
相关论文
共 199 条
[1]   Negotiation behavior when cultures collide: The United States and Japan [J].
Adair, WL ;
Okumura, T ;
Brett, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :371-385
[2]   Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams [J].
Alper, S ;
Tjosvold, D ;
Law, KS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1998, 74 (01) :33-52
[3]  
AMANATULLAH ET, 2007, GIVING AWAY TOO MUCH
[4]   BRIDGING THE BOUNDARY - EXTERNAL ACTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS [J].
ANCONA, DG ;
CALDWELL, DF .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1992, 37 (04) :634-665
[5]   Human aggression [J].
Anderson, CA ;
Bushman, BJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 53 :27-51
[6]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL CONFLICT CON
[7]  
[Anonymous], HDB CROSS CULTURAL M
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2005, J BUS STRAT, DOI DOI 10.1108/02756660510586300
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1991, STUDIES ORG SOCIOLOG
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1986, DESIGNING EFFECTIVE