Procedure-Related Complications after Genetic Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling

被引:19
|
作者
Kollmann, M. [1 ]
Haeusler, M. [1 ]
Haas, J. [1 ]
Csapo, B. [1 ]
Lang, U. [1 ]
Klaritsch, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Graz, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, A-8036 Graz, Austria
来源
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN | 2013年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
obstetrcis; pregnancy; amniocentesis; chorionic villus; sampling; FETAL LOSS RATE; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS; LOSS RATES; RISK; TRISOMY-21; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1055/s-0032-1312939
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Amniocentesis (AC) and chorionic villus sampling (CVS) play an important role in the diagnosis of genetic anomalies. The aim of this study was to evaluate presentable numbers of procedure-related complications of genetic interventions in a tertiary referral hospital. Materials and Methods: The pregnancy outcome of women who underwent genetic AC or CVS during 2003-2010 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Austria, was analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was miscarriage or membrane rupture after an invasive procedure. Only singleton gestations were included. Results: 1,569 AC procedures and 334 CVS procedures (234 transabdominal, 99 transcervical, 1 with undocumented route) were performed. Of these, 57 cases were excluded from further analysis because of severe anomalies. Complete outcome data were available for 93.17 % of cases. In 164 (8.89 %) cases the pregnancy was terminated due to genetic anomalies or severe malformations. In the remaining collective 10 of 1,342 (0.75 %) AC procedures, 3 of 150 (2.00 %) transabdominal CVS procedures and 2 of 64 (3.13 %) transcervical CVS procedures lead to complications resulting in miscarriage <24 weeks (n = 13) or rupture of membranes (n = 2) within 2 weeks after procedure. Complication rates were significantly higher after CVS than after AC (OR 3.19). Conclusion: Over an observation period of seven years, the complication rates after AC, transabdominal CVS and transcervical CVS were 0.75 %, 2.00 % and 3.13 %, respectively. These results are comparable to recent international investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 348
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF AMNIOCENTESIS AND CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING FOR PRENATAL GENETIC TESTING
    HECKERLILNG, PS
    VERP, MS
    MEDICAL CARE, 1994, 32 (08) : 863 - 880
  • [32] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as an alternative to amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: psychosocial and ethical aspects
    Vergeer, MM
    van Balen, F
    Ketting, E
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1998, 35 (01) : 5 - 13
  • [33] Risk for placental abruption following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling
    Minna, Tikkanen
    Mika, Gissler
    Tiina, Luukkaala
    Marjo, Metsaranta
    Sture, Andersson
    Olavi, Ylikorkala
    Annukka, Ritvanen
    Vilho, Hiilesmaa
    Jorma, Paavonen
    Mika, Nuutila
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (04) : 410 - 412
  • [34] PROCEDURE-RELATED FETAL LOSSES IN TRANSPLACENTAL VERSUS NONTRANSPLACENTAL GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS
    BOMBARD, AT
    POWERS, JF
    CARTER, S
    SCHWARTZ, A
    NITOWSKY, HM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (03) : 868 - 872
  • [35] Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling in HIV-infected pregnant women: a multicentre case series
    Floridia, M.
    Masuelli, G.
    Meloni, A.
    Cetin, I.
    Tamburrini, E.
    Cavaliere, A. F.
    Dalzero, S.
    Sansone, M.
    Alberico, S.
    Guerra, B.
    Spinillo, A.
    Tin, M. Chiado Fiorio
    Ravizza, M.
    Mori, F.
    Ortolani, P.
    dalle Nogare, E. R.
    Di Lorenzo, F.
    Sterrantino, G.
    Meli, M.
    Polemi, S.
    Nocentini, J.
    Baldini, M.
    Montorzi, G.
    Mazzetti, M.
    Rogasi, P.
    Borchi, B.
    Vichi, F.
    Del Pin, B.
    Pinter, E.
    Anzalone, E.
    Marocco, R.
    Mastroianni, C.
    Mercurio, V. S.
    Carocci, A.
    Grilli, E.
    Maccabruni, A.
    Zaramella, M.
    Mariani, B.
    Raponi, G. Natalini
    Guaraldi, G.
    Nardini, G.
    Stentarelli, C.
    Beghetto, B.
    Degli Antoni, A. M.
    Molinari, A.
    Crisalli, M. P.
    Donisi, A.
    Piepoli, M.
    Cerri, V.
    Zuccotti, G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (08) : 1218 - 1223
  • [36] Techniques for chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a survey of practice in specialist UK centres
    Carlin, A. J.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2008, 28 (10) : 914 - 919
  • [37] Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review of the literature
    Beta, Jaroslaw
    Lesmes-Heredia, Cristina
    Bedetti, Chiara
    Akolekar, Ranjit
    MINERVA GINECOLOGICA, 2018, 70 (02): : 215 - 219
  • [38] Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling in multiple gestations? Experience with 500 cases
    van den Berg, C
    Braat, APG
    Van Opstal, D
    Halley, DJJ
    Kleijer, WJ
    den Hollander, NS
    Brandenburg, H
    Pijpers, L
    Los, FJ
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1999, 19 (03) : 234 - 244
  • [39] PATTERNS OF MOOD STATES IN PREGNANT-WOMEN UNDERGOING CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING OR AMNIOCENTESIS
    TUNIS, SL
    GOLBUS, MS
    COPELAND, KL
    FINE, BA
    ROSINSKY, BJ
    SEELY, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1990, 37 (02): : 191 - 199
  • [40] Pain experience during chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: A preliminary study
    Vandenbossche, F.
    Horovitz, J.
    Guyon, F.
    Verret, C.
    Saura, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2008, 136 (02) : 189 - 193