MODEL DEVELOPMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY VIA CONJOINT ANALYSIS

被引:0
|
作者
Stone, Thomas M. [1 ]
Choi, Seung-Kyum [1 ]
Amarchinta, Hemanth [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, George W Woodruff Sch Mech Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Dickinson & Co, Franklin Lakes, NJ USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2012, VOL 3, PTS A AND B | 2012年
关键词
DESIGN SELECTION; OPTIMIZATION; METHODOLOGY; COEFFICIENT; INFORMATION; SIMULATION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Model development decisions are critical in the early phases of engineering design. Engineering models serve as representations of reality that help designers understand input/output relationships, answer 'what-if' questions, and find optimal design solutions. Upon making model development decisions, the designer commits a large percentage of the costs associated with reaching design goals/objectives. The decisions dictate cost-drivers such as experimental setups and computation time. Unfortunately, the desire to develop the most accurate model competes with the desire to reduce costs. The designer is ultimately required to make trade-offs between attributes when choosing the best model development decision. Hence it is critical to develop tools for selecting the model development decision that appropriately balances trade-offs. A framework is proposed for model development decision-making. Conjoint Analysis (CA) is implemented in order to handle trade-offs among attributes. Thus, the framework can be used to make optimal decisions based on the assessment of multiple attributes. Moreover, the framework addresses the uncertainty that exists early in model design. Imprecision in model parameters are estimated and propagated through the model. In particular, the proposed decision framework is employed to select the optimal model development decision with respect to the final phase of experimentation. Preference intervals are evaluated in order to choose which final experimentation to perform. The decision framework proves to be. useful for making model development decisions under uncertainty by considering the preference of multiple attributes and the imprecision of said attributes that is prevalent in early model development phases.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / +
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gambling in the Visual Periphery: A Conjoint-Measurement Analysis of Human Ability to Judge Visual Uncertainty
    Zhang, Hang
    Morvan, Camille
    Maloney, Laurence T.
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2010, 6 (12)
  • [22] Smoothing spline via optimal control under uncertainty
    Yu, Changjun
    Wang, Yujing
    Li, Linna
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2018, 58 : 203 - 216
  • [23] Health-Seeking Preferences of Elderly Filipinos in the Community via Conjoint Analysis
    de Guzman, Allan B.
    Lores, Kaila Vail A.
    Lozano, Maria Clarissa R.
    Lozano, Marilei C.
    Lu, Deanne M.
    Ma, Christopher Emmanuel D. V.
    Macrohon, Calvin Rei L.
    EDUCATIONAL GERONTOLOGY, 2014, 40 (11) : 801 - 815
  • [24] Advanced conjoint analysis using feature selection via support vector machines
    Maldonado, Sebastian
    Montoya, Ricardo
    Weber, Richard
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 241 (02) : 564 - 574
  • [25] Water-energy nexus under uncertainty: Development of a hierarchical decision-making model
    Ma, Y.
    Li, Y. P.
    Huang, G. H.
    Liu, Y. R.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 591
  • [26] Parking Pricing and Model Split under Uncertainty
    Zhu, Chengjuan
    Jia, Bin
    Han, Linghui
    Gao, Ziyou
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2014, 2014
  • [27] A decision model for berth allocation under uncertainty
    Zhen, Lu
    Lee, Loo Hay
    Chew, Ek Peng
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2011, 212 (01) : 54 - 68
  • [28] Tactical Crop planning model under uncertainty
    Ramirez Castaneda, Leila Nayibe
    Prado Beltran, Olga Lucia
    INGE CUC, 2020, 16 (02)
  • [29] Development of an interval multi-stage stochastic programming model for regional energy systems planning and GHG emission control under uncertainty
    Li, Gongchen
    Huang, Guohe
    Lin, Qianguo
    Cai, Yanpeng
    Chen, Yumin
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2012, 36 (12) : 1161 - 1174
  • [30] AN APPROACH TO MODELING CUSTOMER PREFERENCE UNCERTAINTY BY APPLYING BOOTSTRAP TO CHOICE-BASED CONJOINT ANALYSIS DATA
    Razu, Swithin S.
    Takai, Shun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, DETC 2010, VOL 6, 2010, : 205 - 212