Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Based Early Detection of Acute Renal Transplant Rejection

被引:31
|
作者
Khalifa, Fahmi [1 ]
Beache, Garth M. [2 ]
Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed [3 ]
El-Diasty, Tarek [3 ]
Gimel'farb, Georgy [4 ]
Kong, Maiying [5 ]
El-Baz, Ayman [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, BioImaging Lab, Bioengn Dept, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Dept Radiol, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
[3] Univ Mansoura, Dept Radiol, Urol & Nephrol Ctr, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
[4] Univ Auckland, Dept Comp Sci, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[5] Univ Louisville, Dept Bioinformat Biostat, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
Acute renal transplant rejection; dynamic perfusion; iso-contours; Laplace equation; level set; nonrigid registration; LEVEL SET SEGMENTATION; MOVEMENT CORRECTION; GRAPH CUTS; DCE-MRI; KIDNEY; REGISTRATION; IMAGES; ALGORITHM; TEXTURE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2013.2269139
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
A novel framework for the classification of acute rejection versus nonrejection status of renal transplants from 2-D dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is proposed. The framework consists of four steps. First, kidney objects are segmented from adjacent structures with a level set deformable boundary guided by a stochastic speed function that accounts for a fourth-order Markov-Gibbs random field model of the kidney/background shape and appearance. Second, a Laplace-based nonrigid registration approach is used to account for local deformations caused by physiological effects. Namely, the target kidney object is deformed over closed, equispaced contours (iso-contours) to closely match the reference object. Next, the cortex is segmented as it is the functional kidney unit that is most affected by rejection. To characterize rejection, perfusion is estimated from contrast agent kinetics using empirical indexes, namely, the transient phase indexes (peak signal intensity, time-to-peak, and initial up-slope), and a steady-phase index defined as the average signal change during the slowly varying tissue phase of agent transit. We used a kappa(n)-nearest neighbor classifier to distinguish between acute rejection and nonrejection. Performance of our method was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Experimental results in 50 subjects, using a combinatoric kappa(n)-classifier, correctly classified 92% of training subjects, 100% of the test subjects, and yielded an area under the ROC curve that approached the ideal value. Our proposed framework thus holds promise as a reliable noninvasive diagnostic tool.
引用
收藏
页码:1910 / 1927
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies
    O'Connor, James P. B.
    Jackson, Alan
    Parker, Geoff J. M.
    Roberts, Caleb
    Jayson, Gordon C.
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 9 (03) : 167 - 177
  • [32] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of brown and beige adipose tissues
    Yaligar, Jadegoud
    Verma, Sanjay Kumar
    Gopalan, Venkatesh
    Anantharaj, Rengaraj
    Giang Thi Thu Le
    Kaur, Kavita
    Mallilankaraman, Karthik
    Leow, Melvin Khee Shing
    Velan, S. Sendhil
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 84 (01) : 384 - 395
  • [33] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in oncology: how we do it
    Petralia, Giuseppe
    Summers, Paul E.
    Agostini, Andrea
    Ambrosini, Roberta
    Cianci, Roberta
    Cristel, Giulia
    Calistri, Linda
    Colagrande, Stefano
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2020, 125 (12): : 1288 - 1300
  • [34] Multiparametric Characterization of Response to Anti-angiogenic Therapy Using USPIO Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Combination with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Kim, Jana
    Kim, Eugene
    Euceda, Leslie R.
    Meyer, Dan E.
    Langseth, Karina
    Bathen, Tone F.
    Moestue, Siver A.
    Huuse, Else Marie
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (06) : 1589 - 1600
  • [35] Feasibility of multiple-mouse dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Ramirez, Marc S.
    Ragan, Dustin K.
    Kundra, Vikas
    Banksonl, James A.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 58 (03) : 610 - 615
  • [36] How accurate is dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the assessment of renal glomerular filtration rate?: A critical appraisal
    Mendichovszky, Iosif
    Pederson, Michael
    Frokiaer, Jorgen
    Dissing, Thomas
    Grenier, Nicolas
    Anderson, Peter
    McHugh, Kieran
    Yang, Qing
    Gordon, Isky
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2008, 27 (04) : 925 - 931
  • [37] Motion Compensated Generalized Reconstruction for Free-Breathing Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Filipovic, M.
    Vuissoz, P. -A.
    Codreanu, A.
    Claudon, M.
    Felblinger, J.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2011, 65 (03) : 812 - 822
  • [38] Motion-compensated image reconstruction for improved kidney function assessment using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Ariyurek, Cemre
    Kocanaogullari, Aziz
    Afacan, Onur
    Kurugol, Sila
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2024, 37 (06)
  • [39] Measurement of Placental Perfusion by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI at 4.7 T
    Alison, Marianne
    Quibel, Thibault
    Balvay, Daniel
    Autret, Gwennhael
    Bourillon, Camille
    Chalouhi, Gihad E.
    Deloison, Benjamin
    Salomon, Laurent J.
    Cuenod, Charles Andre
    Clement, Olivier
    Siauve, Nathalie
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (07) : 535 - 542
  • [40] Modeling Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Data with a Constrained Local AIF
    Duan, Chong
    Kallehauge, Jesper F.
    Perez-Torres, Carlos J.
    Bretthorst, G. Larry
    Beeman, Scott C.
    Tanderup, Kari
    Ackerman, Joseph J. H.
    Garbow, Joel R.
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 20 (01) : 150 - 159