Measuring Health Care Interprofessionals' Moral Resilience: Validation of the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale

被引:51
作者
Heinze, Katherine E. [1 ]
Hanson, Ginger [2 ]
Holtz, Heidi [3 ]
Swoboda, Sandra M. [2 ,4 ]
Rushton, Cynda H. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Christine E Lynn Coll Nursing, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Barnes Jewish Coll, Goldfarb Sch Nursing, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Johns Hopkins Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Berman Inst Bioeth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
moral obligation; moral resilience; professional burnout; psychological resilience; psychometrics; BURNOUT; DISTRESS; NURSES; PROFESSIONALS; VALUES;
D O I
10.1089/jpm.2020.0328
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Health care interprofessionals face competing obligations to their patients, employers, and themselves. When ethical conflicts ensue and competing obligations cannot be resolved, health care interprofessionals have reported experiencing symptoms of burnout, moral distress, and other types of moral suffering. Recently, moral resilience or "the capacity of an individual to sustain or restore their integrity in response to moral adversity," has been proposed as a resource to address moral suffering while contributing to well-being. Objectives: Develop and validate an instrument to measure moral resilience. Design: Phase one: item development and expert review. Phase two: focus groups with health care interprofessionals to refine items. Phase three: psychometric testing. Setting/Subjects: Seven hundred twenty-three health care interprofessionals participated; inclusion criteria included being a chaplain, nurse, physician, or social worker, and having practiced at least 1 year. Participants were recruited from seven academic and community hospitals in the Eastern United States. Results: One hundred items were created for expert review. Following focus groups to refine items, 35 items remained for psychometric testing. Eighteen items were removed following item analysis. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the remaining items suggested a four-factor solution, titled Responses to Moral Adversity, Personal Integrity, Moral Efficacy, and Relational Integrity, respectively. Overall reliability was alpha = 0.84. The Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS) demonstrated convergent validity with the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale-10 and criterion validity with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey. Conclusion: The RMRS demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability. Examining the factor structure of moral resilience contributes to burgeoning moral resilience science and enables future research. Moral Resilience offers a promising pathway to support interprofessionals' integrity even when faced with ethical challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 872
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] "Why Are We Doing This?": Clinician Helplessness in the Face of Suffering
    Back, Anthony L.
    Rushton, Cynda H.
    Kaszniak, Alfred W.
    Halifax, Joan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2015, 18 (01) : 26 - 30
  • [2] Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience
    Campbell-Sills, Laura
    Stein, Murray B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2007, 20 (06) : 1019 - 1028
  • [3] Nurse staffing, burnout, and health care-associated infection
    Cimiotti, Jeannie P.
    Aiken, Linda H.
    Sloane, Douglas M.
    Wu, Evan S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2012, 40 (06) : 486 - 490
  • [4] Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods
    Collins, D
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (03) : 229 - 238
  • [5] Committee on Systems Approaches to Improve Patient Care by Supporting Clinician Well-Being National Academy of Medicine National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2019, TAK ACT CLIN BURN SY
  • [6] Conceptualising moral resilience for nursing practice
    Defilippis, Tiziana M. L. Sala
    Curtis, Katherine
    Gallagher, Ann
    [J]. NURSING INQUIRY, 2019, 26 (03)
  • [7] Epstein Elizabeth G, 2019, AJOB Empir Bioeth, V10, P113, DOI 10.1080/23294515.2019.1586008
  • [8] Interprofessionals' definitions of moral resilience
    Holtz, Heidi
    Heinze, Katherine
    Rushton, Cynda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (3-4) : e488 - e494
  • [9] Using the cognitive interviewing process to improve survey design by allied health: A qualitative study
    Howlett, Owen
    McKinstry, Carol
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2018, 65 (02) : 126 - 134
  • [10] Future of the Palliative Care Workforce: Preview to an Impending Crisis
    Kamal, Arif H.
    Bull, Janet H.
    Swetz, Keith M.
    Wolf, Steven P.
    Shanafelt, Tait D.
    Myers, Evan R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 130 (02) : 113 - 114