Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies

被引:197
作者
Chaloupka, FJ
Cummings, KM
Morley, CP
Horan, JK
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Econ MC 144, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Canc Prevent Epidemiol & Biostat, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i62
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To examine tobacco company documents to determine what the companies knew about the impact of cigarette prices on smoking among youth, young adults, and adults, and to evaluate how this understanding affected their pricing and price related marketing strategies. Methods: Data for this study come from tobacco industry documents contained in the Youth and Marketing database created by the Roswell Park Cancer Institute and available through http://roswell.tobaccodocuments.org, supplemented with documents obtained from http://www.tobaccodocuments.org. Results: Tobacco company documents provide clear evidence on the impact of cigarette prices on cigarette smoking, describing how tax related and other price increases lead to significant reductions in smoking, particularly among young persons. This information was very important in developing the industry's pricing strategies, including the development of lower price branded generics and the pass through of cigarette excise tax increases, and in developing a variety of price related marketing efforts, including multi-pack discounts, couponing, and others. Conclusions: Pricing and price related promotions are among the most important marketing tools employed by tobacco companies. Future tobacco control efforts that aim to raise prices and limit price related marketing efforts are likely to be important in achieving reductions in tobacco use and the public health toll caused by tobacco.
引用
收藏
页码:I62 / I72
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, EMPIRICAL APPROACHES
[2]  
[Anonymous], STUD PUBL ATT CIG SM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HDB HLTH EC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Reducing tobacco use: A report of the surgeon general
[5]  
BECKER GS, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P396
[6]   A THEORY OF RATIONAL ADDICTION [J].
BECKER, GS ;
MURPHY, KM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1988, 96 (04) :675-700
[7]  
BENSON SR, 1992, PRICE SENSITIVITY AG
[8]  
BURNETT L, 1988, P MORRIS US PROPOSIT
[9]  
BURNETT L, 1990, NEW JERSEY TOBACCO T
[10]  
Burrows D., 1982, NBER MODELS PRICE SE