An Evidential-Reasoning-Interval-Based Method for New Product Design Assessment

被引:45
作者
Chin, Kwai-Sang [1 ]
Yang, Jian-Bo [2 ]
Guo, Min [1 ,3 ]
Lam, James Ping-Kit [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Mfg Engn & Engn Management, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester Business Sch, Manchester M15 6PB, Lancs, England
[3] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Syst Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Evidential reasoning (ER); multiple-attribute decision analysis (MADA); new product development; product design assessment; MULTIATTRIBUTE DECISION-ANALYSIS; FUZZY SETS; UNCERTAINTY; ALTERNATIVES; AGGREGATION; INDUSTRIES; SELECTION; PROJECTS; SUCCESS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1109/TEM.2008.2009792
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A key issue in successful new product development is how to determine the best product design among a lot of feasible alternatives. In this paper, the authors present a novel rigorous assessment methodology to improve the decision-making analysis in the complex multiple-attribute environment of new product design (NPD) assessment in early product design stage, where several performance measures, like product functions and features, manufacturability and cost, quality and reliability, maintainability and serviceability, etc., must be accounted for, but no concrete and reliable data are available, in which conventional approaches cannot be applied with confidence. The developed evidential reasoning (ER) interval methodology is able to deal with uncertain and incomplete data and information in forms of both qualitative and quantitative nature, data expressed in interval and range, judgment with probability functions, judgment in a comparative basis, unknown embedded, etc. An NPD assessment model, incorporated with the ER-based methodology, is then developed and a software system is built accordingly for validation. An industrial case study of electrical appliances is used to illustrate the application of the developed ER methodology and the product design assessment system.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 156
页数:15
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Evaluation of sub-component alternatives in product design processes [J].
Akgunduz, A ;
Zetu, D ;
Banerjee, P ;
Liang, D .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2002, 18 (01) :69-81
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Decisions with Multiple Objectives
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, AHP SERIES
[4]  
[Anonymous], FUZZY SETS SYSTEMS
[5]   PREFERENCE SIMULATION AND PREFERENCE PROGRAMMING - ROBUSTNESS ISSUES IN PRIORITY DERIVATION [J].
ARBEL, A ;
VARGAS, LG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 69 (02) :200-209
[6]  
Arbel Ami., 1992, Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference held in Fairfax, Virginia, P61
[7]   Key success factors for technological entrepreneurs' R&D projects [J].
Åstebro, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2004, 51 (03) :314-321
[8]   RATING AND RANKING OF MULTIPLE-ASPECT ALTERNATIVES USING FUZZY SETS [J].
BAAS, SM ;
KWAKERNAAK, H .
AUTOMATICA, 1977, 13 (01) :47-58
[9]  
BELTMAN RE, 1970, MANAGE SCI, V17, P141
[10]  
Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC