Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Mini-Mental State Examination performance in patients with mild-to-moderate dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer's disease, and normal participants in Taiwan

被引:29
作者
Wang, Carol Sheei-Meei [1 ]
Pai, Ming-Chyi [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Pai-Lien [4 ]
Hou, Nien-Tsen [5 ]
Chien, Pei-Fang [1 ]
Huang, Ying-Che [5 ]
机构
[1] Tainan Hosp, Dept Hlth, Dept Psychiat, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Div Behav Neurol,Dept Neurol, Tainan 700, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Alzheimers Dis Ctr, Tainan 700, Taiwan
[4] FHI 360, Dept Biostat, Durham, NC 27713 USA
[5] Tainan Hosp, Dept Hlth, Dept Neurol, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
dementia with Lewy bodies; Alzheimer's disease; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Mini-Mental State Examination; PARKINSONS-DISEASE; SCREENING TOOL; IMPAIRMENT; DIFFERENTIATION; DIAGNOSIS; MOCA; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610213001245
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to examine and test the sensitivity, specificity, and threshold scores of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and determine those that best correspond to a clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Methods: Sixty-seven Alzheimer's disease (AD), 36 DLB, and 62 healthy participants without dementia (NC), aged 60 to 90, were enrolled. All three groups took the MoCA and MMSE tests at the same time. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests and receiver operating characteristics curve analysis were used to compare the different neuropsychological test results among the groups. Results: The cut-off point of the MoCA for AD was 21/22 with a sensitivity of 95.5% and a specificity of 82.3% (area under the curve (AUC): 0.945), and the cut-off point for DLB was 22/23 with a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 80.6% (AUC: 0.932). For the MMSE, the cut-off points for AD and for DLB from NC were all 24/25, with a sensitivity of 88.1% and a specificity of 85.5% for AD (AUC: 0.92), and a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 85.5% for DLB (AUC: 0.895). After controlling sex, age, and education, AD and DLB had lower scores in all MoCA subscales than the NC group (p < 0.05), except for the orientation and naming in DLB. In addition, AD had a lower score in the MoCA orientation (p = 0.03) and short-term memory (p = 0.02) than did DLB. Conclusions: The MoCA is a more sensitive instrument than the MMSE to screen AD or DLB patients from non-dementia cases.
引用
收藏
页码:1839 / 1848
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Converting from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to the Mini-Mental State Examination-2
    Yang, Hwabeen
    Yim, Daehyuk
    Park, Moon Ho
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [22] Cognitive Performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Across the Healthy Adult Lifespan
    Gluhm, Shea
    Goldstein, Jody
    Loc, Kiet
    Colt, Alexandra
    Van Liew, Charles
    Corey-Bloom, Jody
    COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY, 2013, 26 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [23] A Comparison of the Czech Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test with the Mini Mental State Examination in Identifying Cognitive Deficits in Parkinson's Disease
    Bezdicek, O.
    Balabanova, P.
    Havrankova, P.
    Stochl, J.
    Roth, J.
    Ruzicka, E.
    CESKA A SLOVENSKA NEUROLOGIE A NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2010, 73 (02) : 150 - 156
  • [24] Low Sensitivity of the Mini-Mental State Examination for Cognitive Assessment of Brazilian Patients With Parkinson Disease
    Breder, Raphael
    Araujo Leite, Marco Antonio
    Pinto, Jony Arrais, Jr.
    Cavalcante, Igor Pinto
    Pessoa, Bruno Lima
    Orsini Neves, Marco Antonio
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGY, 2017, 30 (06) : 311 - 315
  • [25] Responsiveness to Change of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Mental State Examination, and SCOPA-Cog in Non-Demented Patients with Parkinson's Disease
    Faust-Socher, Achinoam
    Duff-Canning, Sarah
    Grabovsky, Arthur
    Armstrong, Melissa J.
    Rothberg, Brandon
    Eslinger, Paul J.
    Meaney, Christopher A.
    Schneider, Ruth B.
    Tang-Wai, David F.
    Fox, Susan H.
    Zadikoff, Cindy
    Kennedy, Nancy
    Chou, Kelvin L.
    Persad, Carol
    Litvan, Irene
    Mast, Benjamin T.
    Gerstenecker, Adam T.
    Weintraub, Sandra
    Reginold, William
    Marras, Connie
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 47 (4-6) : 187 - 197
  • [26] Equating conversion norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in healthy subjects and patients with neurodegenerative disorders
    Bernini, Sara
    Ballante, Elena
    Picascia, Marta
    Barbieri, Marica
    Costa, Alfredo
    Cavallini, Elena
    Tassorelli, Cristina
    Vecchi, Tomaso
    Bottiroli, Sara
    EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 2025, 205
  • [27] A Hierarchical Bayesian Latent Class Model for the Diagnostic Performance of Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease
    Wang, X.
    Li, F.
    Zhu, H.
    Jiang, Z.
    Niu, G.
    Gao, Q.
    JPAD-JOURNAL OF PREVENTION OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2022, 9 (04): : 589 - 600
  • [28] Validation of conversion between mini-mental state examination and montreal cognitive assessment
    Lawton, Michael
    Kasten, Meike
    May, Margaret T.
    Mollenhauer, Brit
    Schaumburg, Martina
    Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga
    Maetzler, Walter
    Vollstedt, Eva-Juliane
    Hu, Michele T. M.
    Berg, Daniela
    Ben-Shlomo, Yoav
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2016, 31 (04) : 593 - 596
  • [29] The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Creating a Crosswalk with the Mini-Mental State Examination
    Saczynski, Jane S.
    Inouye, Sharon K.
    Guess, Jamey
    Jones, Richard N.
    Fong, Tamara G.
    Nemeth, Emese
    Hodara, Ariel
    Ngo, Long
    Marcantonio, Edward R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2015, 63 (11) : 2370 - 2374
  • [30] The Mini-Mental State exam may help in the differentiation of dementia with Lewy bodies and Alzheimer's disease
    Ala, TA
    Hughes, LF
    Kyrouac, GA
    Ghobrial, MW
    Elble, RJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 17 (06) : 503 - 509