Neighborhood Diversity Promotes Cooperation in Social Dilemmas

被引:49
|
作者
Qin, Jiahu [1 ]
Chen, Yaming [1 ]
Fu, Weiming [1 ]
Kang, Yu [1 ]
Perc, Metjaz [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Dept Automat, Hefei 230027, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Maribor, Fac Nat Sci & Math, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
[3] Univ Maribor, Ctr Appl Math & Theoret Phys, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2018年 / 6卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Complexity theory; evolutionary computation; social engineering; cooperative systems; GAME; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2776966
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
How and why cooperation is able to prevail in social dilemma situations is an intensely investigated subject with much relevance for the well-being of human societies. Many mechanisms that promote cooperation have been identified within the theoretical framework of evolutionary game theory. Here, we advance the subject by relaxing the simplified assumption that each player in the population has the same number of interaction neighbors. This assumption indeed contradicts actual conditions, and it is, thus, important to understand what consequences this has for the evolution of cooperation. We therefore take into consideration that replacement and interaction neighbors can differ, and moreover, that each player can randomly select the number of interaction neighbors. The results of Monte Carlo simulations reveal that the introduction of neighborhood diversity elevates the level of cooperation in various types of social dilemmas, including the prisoner's dilemma and the snowdrift game. We also show that the same mechanism of cooperation promotion remains valid in evolutionary multigames. Taken together, our results strongly support the assertion that diversity, in general, is a strong facilitator of cooperation even under the most testing conditions and they provide a rationale for engineering better social systems.
引用
收藏
页码:5003 / 5009
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Group transformation: How demonstrability promotes intra-group cooperation in social dilemmas
    Hopthrow, Timothy
    Abrams, Dominic
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (05) : 799 - 803
  • [22] Spontaneous Giving under Structural Inequality: Intuition Promotes Cooperation in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas
    Lotz, Sebastian
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [23] COMMUNICATION, COMMITMENT, AND COOPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS
    KERR, NL
    KAUFMANGILLILAND, CM
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 66 (03) : 513 - 529
  • [24] Cooperation in social dilemmas, trust and reciprocity
    Chaudhuri, A
    Sopher, B
    Strand, P
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 23 (02) : 231 - 249
  • [25] A Model of Human Cooperation in Social Dilemmas
    Capraro, Valerio
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (08):
  • [26] Group discussion and cooperation in social dilemmas
    Bonas, KS
    Komorita, SS
    PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 22 (11) : 1144 - 1150
  • [27] Synergy and discounting of cooperation in social dilemmas
    Hauert, C
    Michor, F
    Nowak, MA
    Doebeli, M
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (02) : 195 - 202
  • [28] Cooperation and control in multiplayer social dilemmas
    Hilbe, Christian
    Wu, Bin
    Traulsen, Arne
    Nowak, Martin A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (46) : 16425 - 16430
  • [29] RECIPROCITY AND THE INDUCTION OF COOPERATION IN SOCIAL DILEMMAS
    KOMORITA, SS
    PARKS, CD
    HULBERT, LG
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (04) : 607 - 617
  • [30] Social dilemmas and cooperation in complex networks
    Tomassini, Marco
    Pestelacci, Enea
    Luthi, Leslie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS C, 2007, 18 (07): : 1173 - 1185