Digital platforms across the European regional energy markets

被引:54
作者
Duch-Brown, Nestor [1 ,2 ]
Rossetti, Fiammetta [1 ]
机构
[1] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Seville, Spain
[2] Barcelona Inst Econ, Chair Energy Sustainabil, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Energy; Energy union; European policies; Digital single market; Digital transformation; Platforms; GOVERNMENT; QUALITY; CONSUMPTION; INNOVATION; ENTRY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111612
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Digital platforms increasingly propose business models that improve economic organisation-by better coordinating supply and demand under imperfect informationand attain higher efficiency levels. At the same time, the energy generation gradually reshapes into decentralised network with lower capacity, but able to manage demand and supply in real-time. However, the penetration of online platforms within the energy sector poses policy questions that are specific to platforms' business models. This study investigates a sample of 217 digital platforms running energy-related activities across the EU regional markets. These energy platforms make about 20% of the world energy platforms. By observing their characteristics and those of their surrounding markets, it appears that the digital platforms in the European energy sector still tend to be relatively small and concentrated in specific regions, often in the neighbourhood of capital cities. Furthermore, the quantitative analysis suggests that market size, digital readiness and regulatory quality are the most important features relating to platforms' presence in the EU regional markets. This paper offers empirical evidence and reflections to provide energy policy with key information to best ripe the potential of new technologies while being aware of their inherited complexities.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [31] Can renewable energy power the future?
    Moriarty, Patrick
    Honnery, Damon
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 93 : 3 - 7
  • [32] When the sharing economy becomes neoliberalism on steroids: Unravelling the controversies
    Murillo, David
    Buckland, Heloise
    Val, Esther
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 125 : 66 - 76
  • [33] Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm?
    Nill, Jan
    Kemp, Rene
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (04) : 668 - 680
  • [34] The wealth of regions: quality of government and SMEs in 172 European regions
    Nistotskaya, Marina
    Charron, Nicholas
    Lapuente, Victor
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2015, 33 (05): : 1125 - 1155
  • [35] Electricity market design for the prosumer era
    Parag, Yael
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2016, 1
  • [36] Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Corporate Political Activity: Overcoming Market Barriers in the Clean Energy Sector
    Pinkse, Jonatan
    Groot, Koen
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2015, 39 (03) : 633 - 654
  • [37] Public policy influence on renewable energy investments-A panel data study across OECD countries
    Polzin, Friedemann
    Migendt, Michael
    Taeube, Florian A.
    von Flotow, Paschen
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 80 : 98 - 111
  • [38] Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy
    Richter, Mario
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 1226 - 1237
  • [39] Two-sided markets: a progress report
    Rochet, Jean-Charles
    Tirole, Jean
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2006, 37 (03) : 645 - 667
  • [40] PLATFORM COMPETITION IN TWO-SIDED MARKETS
    Rochet, Jean-Charles
    Tirole, Jean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2003, 1 (04)