Moving Toward Comprehensive Acute Heart Failure Risk Assessment in the Emergency Department The Importance of Self-Care and Shared Decision Making

被引:29
作者
Collins, Sean P. [1 ]
Storrow, Alan B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
acute heart failure; emergency department; risk assessment; CLINICAL-PREDICTION RULES; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; PATIENT PREFERENCES; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CENTERED CARE; FOLLOW-UP; RELAX-AHF; OF-LIFE; HEALTH; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jchf.2013.05.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Nearly 700,000 emergency department (ED) visits were due to acute heart failure (AHF) in 2009. Most visits result in a hospital admission and account for the largest proportion of a projected $70 billion to be spent on heart failure care by 2030. ED-based risk prediction tools in AHF rarely impact disposition decision making. This is a major factor contributing to the 80% admission rate for ED patients with AHF, which has remained unchanged over the last several years. Self-care behaviors such as symptom monitoring, medication taking, dietary adherence, and exercise have been associated with decreased hospital readmissions, yet self-care remains largely unaddressed in ED patients with AHF and thus represents a significant lost opportunity to improve patient care and decrease ED visits and hospitalizations. Furthermore, shared decision making encourages collaborative interaction between patients, caregivers, and providers to drive a care path based on mutual agreement. The observation that "difficult decisions now will simplify difficult decisions later" has particular relevance to the ED, given this is the venue for many such issues. We hypothesize patients as complex and heterogeneous as ED patients with AHF may need both an objective evaluation of physiologic risk as well as an evaluation of barriers to ideal self-care, along with strategies to overcome these barriers. Combining physician gestalt, physiologic risk prediction instruments, an evaluation of self-care, and an information exchange between patient and provider using shared decision making may provide the critical inertia necessary to discharge patients home after a brief ED evaluation. (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 280
页数:8
相关论文
共 86 条
[81]   Shared Treatment Decision Making Improves Adherence and Outcomes in Poorly Controlled Asthma [J].
Wilson, Sandra R. ;
Strub, Peg ;
Buist, A. Sonia ;
Knowles, Sarah B. ;
Lavori, Philip W. ;
Lapidus, Jodi ;
Vollmer, William M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 181 (06) :566-577
[82]   Assessing values for health: Numeracy matters [J].
Woloshin, S ;
Schwartz, LM ;
Moncur, M ;
Gabriel, S ;
Tosteson, ANA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2001, 21 (05) :382-390
[83]   Medication adherence in patients who have heart failure: a review of the literature [J].
Wu, Jia-Rong ;
Moser, Debra K. ;
Lennie, Terry A. ;
Burkhart, Patricia V. .
NURSING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2008, 43 (01) :133-+
[84]  
Yamamoto L G, 1997, Hawaii Med J, V56, P313
[85]   Informed consent and parental choice of anesthesia and sedation for the repair of small lacerations in children [J].
Yamamoto, LG ;
Young, LL ;
Roberts, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1997, 15 (03) :285-289
[86]   Correlates of cognitive impairment among patients with heart failure:: Results of a multicenter survey [J].
Zuccalà, G ;
Marzetti, E ;
Cesari, M ;
Lo Monaco, MR ;
Antonica, L ;
Cocchi, A ;
Carbonin, P ;
Bernabei, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 118 (05) :496-502