Teaching quantum interpretations: Revisiting the goals and practices of introductory quantum physics courses

被引:40
作者
Baily, Charles [1 ]
Finkelstein, Noah D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Sch Phys & Astron, St Andrews KY16 9SS, Fife, Scotland
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Phys, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH | 2015年 / 11卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION; REALITY; PERSPECTIVE; ELECTRONS; BUILDUP; MODELS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020124
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
[This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Upper Division Physics Courses.] Most introductory quantum physics instructors would agree that transitioning students from classical to quantum thinking is an important learning goal, but may disagree on whether or how this can be accomplished. Although (and perhaps because) physicists have long debated the physical interpretation of quantum theory, many instructors choose to avoid emphasizing interpretive themes; or they discuss the views of scientists in their classrooms, but do not adequately attend to student interpretations. In this synthesis and extension of prior work, we demonstrate the following: (i) instructors vary in their approaches to teaching interpretive themes; (ii) different instructional approaches have differential impacts on student thinking; and (iii) when student interpretations go unattended, they often develop their own (sometimes scientifically undesirable) views. We introduce here a new modern physics curriculum that explicitly attends to student interpretations, and provide evidence-based arguments that doing so helps them to develop more consistent interpretations of quantum phenomena, more sophisticated views of uncertainty, and greater interest in quantum physics.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey
    Adams, W. K.
    Perkins, K. K.
    Podolefsky, N. S.
    Dubson, M.
    Finkelstein, N. D.
    Wieman, C. E.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2006, 2 (01):
  • [2] Aspect A., 2004, SPEAKABLE UNSPEAKABL
  • [3] Baggott Jim., 1992, MEANING QUANTUM THEO
  • [4] Baily C., 2011, THESIS U COLORADO BO
  • [5] Interpretive Themes in Quantum Physics: Curriculum Development and Outcomes
    Baily, Charles
    Finkelstein, Noah D.
    [J]. 2011 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2012, 1413 : 107 - 110
  • [6] Interpretation in Quantum Physics as Hidden Curriculum
    Baily, Charles
    Finkelstein, Noah D.
    [J]. 2010 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, 2010, 1289 : 69 - 72
  • [7] Refined characterization of student perspectives on quantum physics
    Baily, Charles
    Finkelstein, Noah D.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2010, 6 (02):
  • [8] Teaching and understanding of quantum interpretations in modern physics courses
    Baily, Charles
    Finkelstein, Noah D.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2010, 6 (01):
  • [9] Development of quantum perspectives in modern physics
    Baily, Charles
    Finkelstein, Noah D.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW SPECIAL TOPICS-PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2009, 5 (01):
  • [10] STATISTICAL INTERPRETATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICS
    BALLENTI.LE
    [J]. REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 1970, 42 (04) : 358 - &