Independent effects of statistical learning and top-down attention

被引:31
作者
Gao, Ya [1 ,2 ]
Theeuwes, Jan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Expt & Appl Psychol, Van der Boechorststr 7, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Inst Brain & Behav Amsterdam iBBA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Attentional capture; Visual search; Working memory; Statistical regularities; Top-down attention; VISUAL-SEARCH; SPATIAL ATTENTION; PROBABILITY; LOCATION; SPECIFICITY; ALLOCATION; MECHANISMS; GUIDANCE; MIND;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-020-02115-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is well known that spatial attention can be directed in a top-down way to task-relevant locations in space. In addition, through visual statistical learning (VSL), attention can be biased towards relevant (target) locations and away from irrelevant (distractor) locations. The present study investigates the interaction between the explicit task-relevant, top-down attention and the lingering attentional biases due to VSL. We wanted to determine the contribution of each of these two processes to attentional selection. In the current study, participants performed a search task while keeping a location in spatial working memory. In Experiment1, the target appeared more often in one location, and appeared less often in other location. In Experiment2, a color singleton distractor was presented more often in location than in all other locations. The results show that when the search target matched the location that was kept in working memory, participants were much faster at responding to the search target than when it did not match, signifying top-down attentional selection. Independent of this top-down effect, we found a clear effect of VSL as responses were even faster when target (Experiment1) or the distractor (Experiment2) was presented at a more likely location in visual field. We conclude that attentional selection is driven by implicit biases due to statistical learning and by explicit top-down processing, each process individually and independently modulating the neural activity within the spatial priority map.
引用
收藏
页码:3895 / 3906
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   The attention habit: how reward learning shapes attentional selection [J].
Anderson, Brian A. .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 1369 :24-39
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J COGNITION, DOI DOI 10.5334/J0C.28
[3]   DERIVING EXACT PREDICTIONS FROM THE CASCADE MODEL [J].
ASHBY, FG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1982, 89 (05) :599-607
[4]   Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory [J].
Awh, E ;
Jonides, J .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2001, 5 (03) :119-126
[5]   Rehearsal in spatial working memory [J].
Awh, E ;
Jonides, J ;
Reuter-Lorenz, PA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (03) :780-790
[6]   Evidence for split attentional foci [J].
Awh, E ;
Pashler, H .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, 26 (02) :834-846
[7]   Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy [J].
Awh, Edward ;
Belopolsky, Artem V. ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (08) :437-443
[8]  
Broadbent D. E., 1958, PERCEPTION COMMUNICA
[9]   Rewards teach visual selective attention [J].
Chelazzi, Leonardo ;
Perlato, Andrea ;
Santandrea, Elisa ;
Della Libera, Chiara .
VISION RESEARCH, 2013, 85 :58-72
[10]   Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention [J].
Chun, MM ;
Jian, YH .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 36 (01) :28-71