Evaluation of the scale of fluctuation of geotechnical parameters by autocorrelation function and semivariogram function

被引:70
作者
Onyejekwe, Site [1 ]
Kang, Xin [2 ,3 ]
Ge, Louis [4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Minist Works, Rd Sect Dev Team, Abuja, Nigeria
[2] Terrasense LLC, 45 Commerce Way, Totowa, NJ 07512 USA
[3] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Scale of fluctuation; Autocorrelation function; Semivariogram function;
D O I
10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.09.014
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The spatial variability of geotechnical parameters is determined in terms of their scale of fluctuation (SOF), theta. There are basically two approaches in analyzing the spatial variability of geotechnical parameters in order to determine their SOF. One uses an autocorrelation function (ACF) from random field theory and time series analysis and the other uses the semivariogram function (SVF) from geostatistics. Most of the published data on the spatial variability of geotechnical parameters were obtained using these methods, other methods include the local average theory and maximum likelihood method were also commonly adopted in the literature. The SOF, however, is not an inherent geotechnical property. Hence the SOF of a geotechnical parameter is dependent on factors such as geological setting, testing, and estimation methods among others. Since SOF is a non-inherent geotechnical property, it is expected that the SOF computed using different methods will give different values. Based on seven CPTu borings on predominantly soft clay in Hayti, Pemiscot County, Missouri, this paper presents an evaluation of the SOF estimated using both the ACF and the SVF with a view to determining the presence of any patterns to the difference and correlations between the two methods. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Directional autocorrelation function of the polarization-mode dispersion vector [J].
Hadjifaradji, S ;
Chen, L ;
Waddy, DS ;
Bao, XY .
APPLICATIONS OF PHOTONIC TECHNOLOGY 6: CLOSING THE GAP BETWEEN THEORY, DEVELOPMENT, AND APPLICATION, 2003, 5260 :371-376
[42]   Normalization of autocorrelation function for multiple-tau photon correlator [J].
Cheng, Yanting ;
Shen, Jin ;
Liu, Wei ;
Sun, Xianming ;
Yang, Yan .
Zhongguo Jiguang/Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2009, 36 (02) :444-448
[43]   The Partial Autocorrelation Function of an ARMA(1,1)Process [J].
Liang Shihui Mao Huijuan(Guizhou University) ( Ningbo College) .
抚州师专学报, 1990, (02) :1-6
[44]   The Autocorrelation Function Obtained from the Pierson-Moskowitz Spectrum [J].
Yang, Wen ;
Liang, Yuke ;
Leng, Jianxing ;
Li, Ming .
GLOBAL OCEANS 2020: SINGAPORE - U.S. GULF COAST, 2020,
[45]   Warp Weave Texture Feature Recognition Based on Autocorrelation Function [J].
Ma, Yunfang .
AUTOMATION EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS, PTS 1-4, 2012, 468-471 :1090-1093
[46]   Estimating the spatial autocorrelation function for ultrasound scatterers in isotropic media [J].
Chen, JF ;
Zagzebski, JA ;
Dong, F ;
Madsen, EL .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) :648-655
[47]   Proposal of a new autocorrelation function in low wind speed conditions [J].
Moor, L. P. ;
Degrazia, G. A. ;
Stefanello, M. B. ;
Mortarini, L. ;
Acevedo, O. C. ;
Maldaner, S. ;
Szinvelski, C. R. P. ;
Roberti, D. R. ;
Buligon, L. ;
Anfossi, D. .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2015, 438 :286-292
[48]   Quantifying information content in data compression using the autocorrelation function [J].
Sanborn, S ;
Ma, X .
IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS, 2005, 12 (03) :230-233
[49]   The Gauss-cos model for the autocorrelation function of fertility rate [J].
Wu, Zongmin ;
Yang, Ran .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2024, 480
[50]   COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO METHODS FOR ESTIMATING THE VERTICAL SCALE OF FLUCTUATION FOR MODELING RANDOM GEOTECHNICAL PROBLEMSf [J].
Pieczynska-Kozlowska, Joanna M. .
STUDIA GEOTECHNICA ET MECHANICA, 2015, 37 (04) :95-103