Evaluation of the scale of fluctuation of geotechnical parameters by autocorrelation function and semivariogram function

被引:70
作者
Onyejekwe, Site [1 ]
Kang, Xin [2 ,3 ]
Ge, Louis [4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Minist Works, Rd Sect Dev Team, Abuja, Nigeria
[2] Terrasense LLC, 45 Commerce Way, Totowa, NJ 07512 USA
[3] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Scale of fluctuation; Autocorrelation function; Semivariogram function;
D O I
10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.09.014
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The spatial variability of geotechnical parameters is determined in terms of their scale of fluctuation (SOF), theta. There are basically two approaches in analyzing the spatial variability of geotechnical parameters in order to determine their SOF. One uses an autocorrelation function (ACF) from random field theory and time series analysis and the other uses the semivariogram function (SVF) from geostatistics. Most of the published data on the spatial variability of geotechnical parameters were obtained using these methods, other methods include the local average theory and maximum likelihood method were also commonly adopted in the literature. The SOF, however, is not an inherent geotechnical property. Hence the SOF of a geotechnical parameter is dependent on factors such as geological setting, testing, and estimation methods among others. Since SOF is a non-inherent geotechnical property, it is expected that the SOF computed using different methods will give different values. Based on seven CPTu borings on predominantly soft clay in Hayti, Pemiscot County, Missouri, this paper presents an evaluation of the SOF estimated using both the ACF and the SVF with a view to determining the presence of any patterns to the difference and correlations between the two methods. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Golden Ratio Autocorrelation Function and the Exponential Decay
    Tsekov, Roumen
    FLUCTUATION AND NOISE LETTERS, 2015, 14 (02):
  • [22] Lifetimes of atomic Rydberg states by autocorrelation function
    Jabri, H
    Eleuch, H
    Djerad, T
    LASER PHYSICS LETTERS, 2005, 2 (05) : 253 - 257
  • [23] Linear Prediction Using Refined Autocorrelation Function
    M Shahidur Rahman
    Tetsuya Shimamura
    EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing, 2007
  • [24] Universal hypothesis of autocorrelation function from Krylov complexity
    Ren Zhang
    Hui Zhai
    Quantum Frontiers, 3 (1):
  • [25] Analysis of Autocorrelation Function of Boolean Functions in Haar Domain
    Rafiq, H. M.
    Siddiqi, M. U.
    PROCEEDINGS OF 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (ICCCE 2016), 2016, : 106 - 110
  • [26] Pitch extraction by using autocorrelation function on the log spectrum
    Kunieda, N
    Shimamura, T
    Suzuki, J
    ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS IN JAPAN PART III-FUNDAMENTAL ELECTRONIC SCIENCE, 2000, 83 (01): : 90 - 98
  • [27] Measurement method of aberration from Ronchigram by autocorrelation function
    Sawada, H.
    Sannomiya, T.
    Hosokawa, F.
    Nakamichi, T.
    Kaneyama, T.
    Tomita, T.
    Kondo, Y.
    Tanaka, T.
    Oshima, Y.
    Tanishiro, Y.
    Takayanagi, K.
    ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2008, 108 (11) : 1467 - 1475
  • [28] Improving methods of estimating autocorrelation function in PCS technique
    Shen, J
    Zheng, G
    Li, MC
    Sun, GQ
    OPTICAL DESIGN AND TESTING, 2002, 4927 : 586 - 592
  • [29] AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION AND THE POWER SPECTRUM CALCULATION FOR PRODUCTION PROCESSES
    Shirai, Kenji
    Amano, Yoshinori
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE COMPUTING INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 2016, 12 (06): : 1791 - 1808
  • [30] THE USE OF AUTOCORRELATION FUNCTION TO QUANTIFY PERIODICITY IN SMOOTH PURSUIT
    OHASHI, N
    MIZUKOSHI, K
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 1993, 249 (08) : 482 - 484